If a baby car seat fails and kills (1) baby the whole works is
scrapped & recalled followed by a lawsuit -- but if a vaccine kill 5K+ ..... Fuck it ! Keep pushing the jab !!! Fuck em
Or if an airliner control system fails and 346 passengers are killed in two crashes, do we just shrug and keep on boarding them, because the events are "rare"? (ref. 737 MAX catastrophes). Strange how the government put that product on total hold while the causes and corrections were worked to the nth degree. Not one more death is allowable. But vaccine...it's a shooting gallery. Walk right up!
VAERS data isn't cases from the vaccine, just all cases after having taken it. So your analogy is incorrect, because it would be perfectly normal for a few thousand people to die after hundreds of millions went on a flight. You wouldn't blame the airline for someone dropping dead in a car accident a week later, right? That's what you're doing if you think VAERS data shows the vaccines killed 5k. It's just wrong.
Not really. It's cases that correlate with the vaccine. And with the very low reporting rate, one might expect that those reporting feel very strongly about the correlation.
Hypotheses are formulated upon correlation. If true science existed then this hypothesis would be subjected to the scientific process.
"Vaccine providers are encouraged to report any clinically significant health problem following vaccination to VAERS, whether or not they believe the vaccine was the cause."
Straight from VAERS. So no, they don't need to feel strongly, they are told to report it even if they don't.
Sorry pal, but it would NOT be "perfectly normal" for a few thousand people to die after even hundreds of millions of passenger-flights, as a result of a design flaw. You have a mistaken view of the airline and airplane industries.
It is generally understood that VAERS undersamples the events reported, because they are self-reported. Crank the numbers up by a factor of 100 and you might be closer to the truth.
My point is that the government rightly put the kibosh on the 737 MAX after 346 fatalities, and didn't let up until there was convincing evidence that the flaw had been corrected. NO such diligence regarding the vaccine. (It also turns out that the vaccine companies have histories either of unethical product practices or a complete lack of relevant experience in producing the vaccine.)
You're missing the point entirely, "pal." As I've said over and over again, VAERS deaths are not conclusively linked to the vaccine. So your idea about a design flaw is entirely wrong, it doesn't make sense. The government put the kibosh on the 737 because it was the obvious cause of those deaths. The government wouldn't have stopped the 737 if .000017% of people got sick a week after they flew, because that's nonsense. VAERS deaths are NOT conclusively linked to the vaccine, and that's just reality. Why is that so hard to understand?
If a baby car seat fails and kills (1) baby the whole works is scrapped & recalled followed by a lawsuit -- but if a vaccine kill 5K+ ..... Fuck it ! Keep pushing the jab !!! Fuck em
Or if an airliner control system fails and 346 passengers are killed in two crashes, do we just shrug and keep on boarding them, because the events are "rare"? (ref. 737 MAX catastrophes). Strange how the government put that product on total hold while the causes and corrections were worked to the nth degree. Not one more death is allowable. But vaccine...it's a shooting gallery. Walk right up!
VAERS data isn't cases from the vaccine, just all cases after having taken it. So your analogy is incorrect, because it would be perfectly normal for a few thousand people to die after hundreds of millions went on a flight. You wouldn't blame the airline for someone dropping dead in a car accident a week later, right? That's what you're doing if you think VAERS data shows the vaccines killed 5k. It's just wrong.
Not really. It's cases that correlate with the vaccine. And with the very low reporting rate, one might expect that those reporting feel very strongly about the correlation.
Hypotheses are formulated upon correlation. If true science existed then this hypothesis would be subjected to the scientific process.
"Vaccine providers are encouraged to report any clinically significant health problem following vaccination to VAERS, whether or not they believe the vaccine was the cause."
Straight from VAERS. So no, they don't need to feel strongly, they are told to report it even if they don't.
Sorry pal, but it would NOT be "perfectly normal" for a few thousand people to die after even hundreds of millions of passenger-flights, as a result of a design flaw. You have a mistaken view of the airline and airplane industries.
It is generally understood that VAERS undersamples the events reported, because they are self-reported. Crank the numbers up by a factor of 100 and you might be closer to the truth.
My point is that the government rightly put the kibosh on the 737 MAX after 346 fatalities, and didn't let up until there was convincing evidence that the flaw had been corrected. NO such diligence regarding the vaccine. (It also turns out that the vaccine companies have histories either of unethical product practices or a complete lack of relevant experience in producing the vaccine.)
You're missing the point entirely, "pal." As I've said over and over again, VAERS deaths are not conclusively linked to the vaccine. So your idea about a design flaw is entirely wrong, it doesn't make sense. The government put the kibosh on the 737 because it was the obvious cause of those deaths. The government wouldn't have stopped the 737 if .000017% of people got sick a week after they flew, because that's nonsense. VAERS deaths are NOT conclusively linked to the vaccine, and that's just reality. Why is that so hard to understand?
It didn't kill the 5k, that's not how VAERS data works. Why does nobody read?