Aliens are almost certainly a reality somewhere in our galaxy. Probably abundantly so.
But, aliens with technology (electronics or something more advanced) are not a statistical fact for our galaxy. There's fairly good reason to believe those are rare (unless they have been observed and hidden from us, in which case that changes the math on it quite a bit).
I actually think that aliens are a statistical **impossibility. Assuming Darwinian evolution is true, there's just not enough time in the Universe (~15+ Billion years old) for ANOTHER advanced life form to evolve by purely natural, unguided random processes somewhere else.
It's already too large of a statistical jump to say that Carbon based life was able to naturally evolve by purely natural, unguided random chance. Now we want to say that same process happened somewhere **else in the universe to produce a MORE advanced life form?? I mean jeez, talk about lighting striking twice!
Too big of a jump for me with not enough "evolutionary" Time for it to happen twice.
Yeah man, I agree Darwinian Evolution is false. I was just using their own paradigm against them. Should’ve put “which it isn’t” in parenthesis after saying “assuming Darwinism is true.”
How can the universe be so unfathomably large yet we be the only species to exist in it? Aliens is a statistical fact.
Unless you're a flat earther I suppose.
Aliens are almost certainly a reality somewhere in our galaxy. Probably abundantly so.
But, aliens with technology (electronics or something more advanced) are not a statistical fact for our galaxy. There's fairly good reason to believe those are rare (unless they have been observed and hidden from us, in which case that changes the math on it quite a bit).
Theres probably life everywhere but i dont think it gets off its planet very often.
I actually think that aliens are a statistical **impossibility. Assuming Darwinian evolution is true, there's just not enough time in the Universe (~15+ Billion years old) for ANOTHER advanced life form to evolve by purely natural, unguided random processes somewhere else.
It's already too large of a statistical jump to say that Carbon based life was able to naturally evolve by purely natural, unguided random chance. Now we want to say that same process happened somewhere **else in the universe to produce a MORE advanced life form?? I mean jeez, talk about lighting striking twice!
Too big of a jump for me with not enough "evolutionary" Time for it to happen twice.
Yeah man, I agree Darwinian Evolution is false. I was just using their own paradigm against them. Should’ve put “which it isn’t” in parenthesis after saying “assuming Darwinism is true.”
Meh. I guess we'll never really know the truth.