the ideas in that article have merit, in my opinion, but if/when we share this article with normies, we need to keep in mind that this article is actually a 'letter to the editor' in the 'Reader Comments' section of The Lancet journal. It isn't a peer-reviewed paper that the journal accepted for publication. Still, it's a well-written scholarly letter with very valid points.
the ideas in that article have merit, in my opinion, but if/when we share this article with normies, we need to keep in mind that this article is actually a 'letter to the editor' in the 'Reader Comments' section of The Lancet journal. It isn't a peer-reviewed paper that the journal accepted for publication. Still, it's a well-written scholarly letter with very valid points.
Peer-reviewed studies and papers are pure bullshit these days.
The review is a forgone conclusion to support their initial argument, no matter how much their argument is straight out of clown world.