So this may have more meaning than we think. Up to now we presumed that the DS had visibility of such info. If they are now unable to work such data via the tools they had, then they have no route to identify people via the old means they were using.
So this may have more meaning than we think. Up to now we presumed that the DS had visibility of such info. If they are now unable to work such data via the tools they had, then they have no route to identify people via the old means they were using.
That would be very good news indeed...
Someone in another thread had an idea that the subpoena was so they could use evidence they had already obtained thru unconstitutional means...
The specific time window makes that seem likely...
Or they were sending a message to someone.