I want some help. Me and a friend gotten into a big argument about the poisonous vax. One article I posted to him is the 18 reason article and he posted this piece of fake news:
https://www.snopes.com/news/2021/04/16/18-reasons-why/
I know snopes is bad news, but I would like some help in debunking the snopes article since they are known peddlers of falsehood. Specifically, I need help in taking apart and debunking each specific rebuttal they have made.
Bonus points to anyone who can also prove that Snopes are known liars.
I know, but it is probably a worthwhile exercise to debunk the snopes article before it ensnares anyone else, because Snopes is a pretty big name and not everyone know that they are liars.
There's an easier way, fren. Let you buddy get the vax, then wait....
They already did. Trying to rope me in this too. Stood my ground pretty well.
Covid-19- No more deadlier than common flu. Why take an experimental vaccine (ZERO long term data) for this weak ass virus?
Not full FDA approval, VERY important. Not a traditional vaccine, mRNA (again, different).
MODERNA has never successfully brought an mRNA vaccine (not a vaccine) to market with FULL FDA approval.
This was NOT a pandemic (see above).
Look at Fauci's own back and forth position on how to deal with this HOAX of a virus (man made - research gain of function).
ZERO liability for Pharma is vaccine (not a vaccine) goes south (people dying).
Ask them this simple question, 'would you willingly take a shot that has zero long term data with questionable efficacy, to combat a virus that is no more deadlier than the common flu, and the people promoting this shot are not Pharmaceutical company's, but Hollywood actors, politicians, corrupt Physicians, your neighbors, your friends and even your family members who are not qualified to even remotely tell you which drug to take for erectile disfunction???'
Tell them to wake the fuck up.
If they sent a Snopes fact check to counter the article, then they didn't read the article. The author did his research and shared links to the source that he based his opinion on. It is hard to "debunk" facts.
I wouldn’t consider Snopes a reputable news source, just like the CDC.
they ridicule and label all the people with magnets sticking to their arms as anti vaxxers when most of them literally just got the shot..
makes sense to me ill buy it
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4730092/Snopes-brink-founder-accused-fraud-lying.html
Isn’t snipes run by a porn star and her pimp??... thought I read that somewhere.... real one-steins over there....
Completely forgotten about the article. Thanks for reminding me.
Here Snopes handles the claim "The modern policing system in the United States originated from patrols intended to corral escaped slaves."
This was a meme going around the black community, and my buddy asked me about it, so I read the Snopes article he showed me, which says this claim is "Mixed."
Now if you read the whole article the only claim they make that could make it mixed is that slave catchers patrolled, and modern police also patrol. That's it. But since Snopes is FAR more interested in race baiting and making the black community feel oppressed, than they are in truth or investigation, they rate it as "Mixed," and the huge portion of people too lazy to read the article now think there's some truth to it.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/the-origins-of-policing-in-the-united-states/