Good point and thanks for questioning, I had forgotten about those. That makes me think its in reference to the US Corporation that is owned by London and the Vatican. This was in 1871, after Lincoln died and before the others. So Garfield, McKinley and JFK were not lawful presidents under the US constitution.
So Garfield, McKinley and JFK were not lawful presidents under the US constitution.
I never get any actual proof for statements like this, which make us look loony. No offense, I'm open to data and learning new info. However, all we ever see is the declaration that this is a corporation, and the names in all caps, yada yada. Never any concrete evidence that any presidents were not lawful.
If Garfield, McKinley, and JFK were not lawful presidents, then guess who else wasn't!
This is the whole premise of Q. Washington DC is a foreign occupied territory according to DoD Military Law 11.3. You don't have to believe me, time will tell.
I just have yet to view convincing, credible evidence that the Corporation of the United States actually exists or existed. It's become such a part of the legend and lore of the Q movement that it's widely held as axiomatically true. But my mind doesn't work like that. Since I'd never heard about it until 2020, I need to corroborate. It's just incomprehensible to me that something this fundamental about our country has been so effectively kept a deep dark secret for centuries. That, and the whole thing about the birth certificates with the all capital letters meaning each citizen is actually the property of the government...all of it I can find no proof for.
One would logically expect such foundational things, if factual, to be widely known. It's just beyond weird that even as a rabid Trump supporter since 2015, I'd never once heard of this jaw-dropping theory until 2020. Very fishy. Requires further data to confirm.
OK, what about Garfield and McKinley
I'm only questioning because the comment said one successful presidential assassination when there have been four
Good point and thanks for questioning, I had forgotten about those. That makes me think its in reference to the US Corporation that is owned by London and the Vatican. This was in 1871, after Lincoln died and before the others. So Garfield, McKinley and JFK were not lawful presidents under the US constitution.
I never get any actual proof for statements like this, which make us look loony. No offense, I'm open to data and learning new info. However, all we ever see is the declaration that this is a corporation, and the names in all caps, yada yada. Never any concrete evidence that any presidents were not lawful.
If Garfield, McKinley, and JFK were not lawful presidents, then guess who else wasn't!
General Flynn has referenced the corporation before.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_Organic_Act_of_1871
This is the whole premise of Q. Washington DC is a foreign occupied territory according to DoD Military Law 11.3. You don't have to believe me, time will tell.
I'm happy to.
I just have yet to view convincing, credible evidence that the Corporation of the United States actually exists or existed. It's become such a part of the legend and lore of the Q movement that it's widely held as axiomatically true. But my mind doesn't work like that. Since I'd never heard about it until 2020, I need to corroborate. It's just incomprehensible to me that something this fundamental about our country has been so effectively kept a deep dark secret for centuries. That, and the whole thing about the birth certificates with the all capital letters meaning each citizen is actually the property of the government...all of it I can find no proof for.
One would logically expect such foundational things, if factual, to be widely known. It's just beyond weird that even as a rabid Trump supporter since 2015, I'd never once heard of this jaw-dropping theory until 2020. Very fishy. Requires further data to confirm.