After the election, a rumor was out there that the ballots had a watermark that was placed there by the military. States did not know about it and neither did China. So even if there were things they were able to forge ahead of time, the military had proofed the ballots against fraud in this way. Then we didn’t hear much follow up on that so people assumed it was just fake hopium and if you continued to bring it up, especially on T_D, people would yell at you for creating distractions.
Someone did that on this site a few months ago. He tried a few different types of black lights before he found one that showed a few fluorescent ink splatters on the ballot. But it did not show anything like what it in this picture. So I think the trick is to figure out exactly what kind of light is needed.
The machines can print out ballots, presumably with the marking filled in. It's a full-featured voting machine that's perfect for cheating.
Fradulent ballots would not have the watermark. It depends somewhat on how secure the printing of the proper ballots are. But I'm guessing much of the fraud is low tech. Catch the low tech fraud and everything is invalidated.
After the election, a rumor was out there that the ballots had a watermark that was placed there by the military. States did not know about it and neither did China. So even if there were things they were able to forge ahead of time, the military had proofed the ballots against fraud in this way. Then we didn’t hear much follow up on that so people assumed it was just fake hopium and if you continued to bring it up, especially on T_D, people would yell at you for creating distractions.
Right. Any fake ballots might look real to the naked eye, but shine a special light on them and voila: forgeries!
Sun, I kept my mail in ballot and voted in person in Cali. Should I check my mail in ballot?
It might only be a certain frequency of light that reveals it?
Any currency UV lamp should do. I don't know of any special lights for such stuff other than UV. UV LED should work too.
Someone did that on this site a few months ago. He tried a few different types of black lights before he found one that showed a few fluorescent ink splatters on the ballot. But it did not show anything like what it in this picture. So I think the trick is to figure out exactly what kind of light is needed.
The machines can print out ballots, presumably with the marking filled in. It's a full-featured voting machine that's perfect for cheating.
Fradulent ballots would not have the watermark. It depends somewhat on how secure the printing of the proper ballots are. But I'm guessing much of the fraud is low tech. Catch the low tech fraud and everything is invalidated.