Spike proteins by themselves, as in the case of the inoculated, do not migrate into the cell. That is only the case with an actual virus. Part of the problem with these foreign spike proteins produced by the body is that they are not found in nature and do not operate unattached to a virus. Therefore, we do not know what the long term effects are - as in how long do these spike proteins bind to ACE2 since they are not attached to a viral payload being delivered to the cell. Do these spike proteins permanently bind to the ACE2 receptor site thereby inactivating it? Also, with the production of antibodies against that spike protein, does it just sit there waiting to be attacked by antibodies which ultimately negatively impacts the cell it is attached to - all over the body? These spike proteins also bind to CD147 receptors on red blood cells and platelets - which leads to clotting. Ivermectin may help mitigate some of this binding. It is not a perfect solution, but it is one of a couple things we can do to stop some of the damage caused by the spike protein until we can come up with some other solutions.
They may be irritant or toxic in themselves. I think what would be more appropriate than "kill" would be "neutralize" or "absorb" or "block attachment."
Competitive binding would be more appropriate. If the spike protein is competing with Ivermectin for binding sites on ACE2 or CD147 then it would in effect be neutralized to a certain degree - but not completely. The body will still be churning out the spike protein like a factory.
The problem is how long will efforts be required to mitigate the effects of the spike protein? We still do not know how long the body will be producing spike protein. This will determine whether a treatment like Ivermectin will be needed for just a short period of time, or whether someone will need treatment for the rest of their life. That may be the case if what we speculate about the long term risk of autoimmune disease manifests. We just do not know at this point because no studies were done on the long term effects - mostly because coronavirus vaccines never got past the initial animal testing. This whole thing is insane.
What is bothersome to me is that we know this foreign protein coding can be taken up by the human genome. That means it could be passed on to future generations - if they can even reproduce in the future. In addition, this genetic sequencing is patented. Our courts have already ruled that a sequence like this patented synthetic spike protein, which does not exist in nature, is intellectual property and the owner of that property has rights - even if it is in your body. The implications of this are sobering.
My theory on this is the body will continue to produce spike proteins until the polyethylene glycol (hydrogel) breaks down because then there won't be anymore mRNA to continue to tell the target cells to manufacture it.
It's my understanding the mRNA instructions "live" in the hydrogel, which eventually breaks down over time. It appears as though it doesn't break down near as fast as they told us it would and that some races tend to break it down faster than others.
I believe that in 6 to 12 months, most people who got injected will no longer be producing spike proteins. Why? That's when they say you need to get your booster shot.
With the mRNA shots, the hydrogel carrier is the delivery system to get the mRNA into the cell. The cell membrane is made of a bilayer of phospholipids so some lipids enter the cell by passive diffusion while other can be protein mediated. The mRNA is brought into the cell by encapsulating it in a hydrogel carrier that can diffuse across the cell membrane to deliver the mRNA instructions into the cell. The mRNA then gets busy making proteins when it locates the ribosomes. As a side note, there is the possibility that the delivery systems for the shots may also be using a magnetofection to help facilitate better uptake of the genetic material into the cell and eventually the nucleus by utilizing magnetic fields. This may explain some of the "magnetic" phenomenon we are witnessing - just speculating.
At any rate, you are correct in that over time there will not be enough mRNA left to make those proteins as it is used up. That may explain why they want to push for "boosters." The Astra Zeneca and J&J shots use an adenovirus vector to take DNA directly to the nucleus to be transcribed into mRNA. The question at this point is whether some of that RNA from all of the shots can be written into the human genome by reverse transcriptase and become permanently encoded - which could be passed down to future generations. There may be no off switch. We just don't know. The animal trials never got to that point because the animals died due to pathogenic priming. Theoretically it is possible for permanent genomic encoding and the manufacturers are downplaying the risks. Risks they know are possible.
The end result of all the shots is to cause the cells to manufacture foreign synthetic proteins - whether permanently or transiently. In addition, we really do not know if these shots are coding for any other proteins because we are not being told what is in these injections, and the information available seems to indicate the manufactures are making changes. "Boosters" will be piggybacked onto the original authorization applications without having to reapply. This truly is one huge Frankenscience experiment and the world's population are the lab rats. Be safe fren.
Spike proteins by themselves, as in the case of the inoculated, do not migrate into the cell. That is only the case with an actual virus. Part of the problem with these foreign spike proteins produced by the body is that they are not found in nature and do not operate unattached to a virus. Therefore, we do not know what the long term effects are - as in how long do these spike proteins bind to ACE2 since they are not attached to a viral payload being delivered to the cell. Do these spike proteins permanently bind to the ACE2 receptor site thereby inactivating it? Also, with the production of antibodies against that spike protein, does it just sit there waiting to be attacked by antibodies which ultimately negatively impacts the cell it is attached to - all over the body? These spike proteins also bind to CD147 receptors on red blood cells and platelets - which leads to clotting. Ivermectin may help mitigate some of this binding. It is not a perfect solution, but it is one of a couple things we can do to stop some of the damage caused by the spike protein until we can come up with some other solutions.
They may be irritant or toxic in themselves. I think what would be more appropriate than "kill" would be "neutralize" or "absorb" or "block attachment."
Competitive binding would be more appropriate. If the spike protein is competing with Ivermectin for binding sites on ACE2 or CD147 then it would in effect be neutralized to a certain degree - but not completely. The body will still be churning out the spike protein like a factory.
The problem is how long will efforts be required to mitigate the effects of the spike protein? We still do not know how long the body will be producing spike protein. This will determine whether a treatment like Ivermectin will be needed for just a short period of time, or whether someone will need treatment for the rest of their life. That may be the case if what we speculate about the long term risk of autoimmune disease manifests. We just do not know at this point because no studies were done on the long term effects - mostly because coronavirus vaccines never got past the initial animal testing. This whole thing is insane.
What is bothersome to me is that we know this foreign protein coding can be taken up by the human genome. That means it could be passed on to future generations - if they can even reproduce in the future. In addition, this genetic sequencing is patented. Our courts have already ruled that a sequence like this patented synthetic spike protein, which does not exist in nature, is intellectual property and the owner of that property has rights - even if it is in your body. The implications of this are sobering.
My theory on this is the body will continue to produce spike proteins until the polyethylene glycol (hydrogel) breaks down because then there won't be anymore mRNA to continue to tell the target cells to manufacture it.
It's my understanding the mRNA instructions "live" in the hydrogel, which eventually breaks down over time. It appears as though it doesn't break down near as fast as they told us it would and that some races tend to break it down faster than others.
I believe that in 6 to 12 months, most people who got injected will no longer be producing spike proteins. Why? That's when they say you need to get your booster shot.
With the mRNA shots, the hydrogel carrier is the delivery system to get the mRNA into the cell. The cell membrane is made of a bilayer of phospholipids so some lipids enter the cell by passive diffusion while other can be protein mediated. The mRNA is brought into the cell by encapsulating it in a hydrogel carrier that can diffuse across the cell membrane to deliver the mRNA instructions into the cell. The mRNA then gets busy making proteins when it locates the ribosomes. As a side note, there is the possibility that the delivery systems for the shots may also be using a magnetofection to help facilitate better uptake of the genetic material into the cell and eventually the nucleus by utilizing magnetic fields. This may explain some of the "magnetic" phenomenon we are witnessing - just speculating.
At any rate, you are correct in that over time there will not be enough mRNA left to make those proteins as it is used up. That may explain why they want to push for "boosters." The Astra Zeneca and J&J shots use an adenovirus vector to take DNA directly to the nucleus to be transcribed into mRNA. The question at this point is whether some of that RNA from all of the shots can be written into the human genome by reverse transcriptase and become permanently encoded - which could be passed down to future generations. There may be no off switch. We just don't know. The animal trials never got to that point because the animals died due to pathogenic priming. Theoretically it is possible for permanent genomic encoding and the manufacturers are downplaying the risks. Risks they know are possible.
The end result of all the shots is to cause the cells to manufacture foreign synthetic proteins - whether permanently or transiently. In addition, we really do not know if these shots are coding for any other proteins because we are not being told what is in these injections, and the information available seems to indicate the manufactures are making changes. "Boosters" will be piggybacked onto the original authorization applications without having to reapply. This truly is one huge Frankenscience experiment and the world's population are the lab rats. Be safe fren.