Most likely true, however, the information in the study is a preprint, meaning that just like the preprints claiming hydroxychloroquine was dangerous, this too has not yet gone through peer review and scrutiny to make sure that it is accurate.
Again, probably true, but just be cautious and if you are going to show people this, be honest and open about this not yet been peer-reviewed.
Most likely true, however, the information in the study is a preprint, meaning that just like the preprints claiming hydroxychloroquine was dangerous, this too has not yet gone through peer review and scrutiny to make sure that it is accurate.
Again, probably true, but just be cautious and if you are going to show people this, be honest and open about this not yet been peer-reviewed.
Here is the direct link: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-558954/v1
Get your critical thinking ass outta here.
Jk. Awesome stuff. No matter how hard we want a narrative to be true, it must be backed up with facts and proof.