?Seems somewhat familiar.. HAVE WE SEEN THIS MOVIE BEFORE????
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (80)
sorted by:
Odd is it?
Communists were marxist-lenninists that tore down statues, killed more than 10 million Christians and regular people to disrupt society. The banned free speech, blamed economic hardship on one group of people, the hard working christian middle class, instituted gun control, nationalized healthcare to low quality monopolized monstrosity, performed medical experiments on prisoners and erected concentration camps, called gulags. They claimed they owned each and everybody. Placed not only strict regulations on industry, but determined what and where industry could function.
Does this sound like the policies of a current political party in the US?
big push by Zionist shills to push the Jew victimhood agenda
oy vey, it's so transparent
This guy knows
Not Russians, Slavs in general.
I don't think Ukrainians would appreciate being called Russians, for example, especially after how many of them were killed in particular.
I know multiple Ukrainians personally that lived through the war. They say no such thing and would probably call you out for spouting Nazi propaganda. To be clear, they lost family to the Soviets AND the Nazis. they support neither and see through the lies of both.
You're saying you think Ukrainians would think that. If me claiming I know people that were IN the war is too weak, isn't you supposing what those people would think even weaker?
I keep seeing stuff like this - I still don't know which statues the 'nazis' were supposed to have torn down.
And when it comes to gun control, the only law I can find that is relevant was passed by the Weimar government before Hitler became Chancellor. After Hitler came to power, that previous law was amended to make it less restrictive.
I daresay General Eisenhower confiscated many more guns from the German people than Adolf Hitler ever did.
On top of that, the Germans were incredibly religious people. Them putting the state before God is another bs lie the jews have been spoon feeding us for decades.
The German solders belt buckles read "Gott mit uns" which means God with us.
People need to stop believing all this jew propaganda and start thinking for themselves.
Nice historical revisionism there.
You're a nazi sympathizer, it's very clear.
Try going to Poland or Ukraine or even some places in Russia and saying that.
They'll tell you that you're a total fool for believing that only one side committed atrocities. They'll tell you that both mass-murdered in the millions and both put state before God.
Germany may not have torn down statues of it's own, but it certainly tore/burnt/blew down statues in the countries it invaded.
BOTH were socialist nations. BOTH were atrocious and despicable. To presume that only one is is absurdity.
Around 80% of Warsaw was razed to the ground by the occupation forces before and then during the Warsaw Uprising. This included a campaign of door-to-door civilian executions.
The occupation also featured the destruction or plunder of all kinds of Polish art.
Wikipedia attributes the claim that German officials estimated "over 90%" of art previously in Poland was in their possession to Polityka III Rzeszy w okupowanej Polsce, Tom II (Politics of the Third Reich in Occupied Poland, Part Two) (in Polish); I cannot verify this as I sadly do not speak or read Polish.
One statue in particular torn down was of Adam Mickiewicz, a 19th Polish poet.
Poland endured attempted cultural extermination, and it is well documented and sourced.
The Wikipedia article is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish_culture_during_World_War_II
Supplementing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupation_of_Poland_(1939%E2%80%931945)
See this for a particular event which highlights the despicable nature of both the Nazis and the Soviets: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warsaw_Uprising
Wikipedia is not a perfect source; it does, however, make for a quality source aggregate. This entire article is thoroughly sourced by proper writings and the sorts. Others that have been more objectionable tend to be about modern figures with limited to minimal or low quality sourcing; a chief example of which is the Project Veritas article citing mainstream news as to why Project Veritas is alt-right.
Anyone can list sources. Hell, anyone can write a book. At the end of the day there is only so much you can do to source information; having a wide variety of high quality writers with direct sources goes a long way. If you want to dismiss this information, you should go through each claim that you disagree with and it's sources to rebut it, or find stronger sources that say things to the contrary.
Did you read my post at all? I'm not linking you to the wikipedia articles for Wikipedia but for the sources to each claim, which are numerous. Go deal with the original sources then report back.
I’ve watched that. And then read about Berlin after the Nazis. I’ll take the former any day
...After Germany kept aggressively expanding and declaring war on others...
Source. It is not good practice to cite an entire 10 hour documentary for a single event. It was also not present in the first 20 minutes.
Churchill was not the leader of Great Britain for much of that time.
Also, of course Hitler wouldn't want war. He would want to take without any resistance. On top of that all, are you not familiar with lying? When the media says there is no election fraud, do you believe that?
I actually watched more than the first 20 minutes, but it was becoming apparent it was a waste of my time because the information was purely presented in a sensationalist manner; it's overwhelmingly a propaganda piece. The truth doesn't require the nonsense included; it's 10 hours long and I just wonder how much of that is footage from various old films about "the jews plotting" and so on. I will likely watch it through over time nonetheless, but I can't help but feel I will come out of it having wasted 10 hours on a well-produced farce.
If it were really a quality source it would have claims with direct explicit sourcing in the documentary; it does some of this in parts, but it is not done in such a way that lends itself to the user digging. A huge list of authors and links is shown at the end, but that is not good practice unless the quotations and such are directly linked to each source.
They also bring on random individuals to speak without really explaining or verifying credentials.
On top of this all, their claims are progressive or sloping; they'll state something, then restate it later a little more inaccurately or aggressively until it meets their message.
Why would the truth need to go through these practices of sensationalism and obfuscation? We see that crap all the time with mainstream media pieces; we do not see it in quality research and the likes.
Hitler was a closet fag, was into scatology, and fucked and married his cousin
Nazis were peak degeneracy
The jews rule you. You're a sheep.
Source on this? I've addressed others making these claims before, they're pretty routinely found to be holdout war justification propaganda from Germany and not actual events, for the most part.
Easiest reason why this would have been totally illogical: Poland had not even mobilized most of its army when war broke out; they'd been repeatedly told to delay by the Brits, because the Brits claimed they still believed peace was possible.
Source?
Ah, but how much did they know about Pearl Harbor? Or was it just that they knew some attack was imminent, but not where?
Not exactly, however the Allies did cuck out of their responsibilities to east and central Europe giving them that.
Note how Stalin was, by most accounts, glad to work with Hitler, including partitioning Poland.
Poland and the USSR were never/not allies; it took the majority of Polish patriots and massive amounts of civilians being exterminated/executed/etc. by BOTH regimes for the Soviets to be able to impose communism.
There was a whole war fought by the brand new Polish state to prevent the spread of Communism into the ripe war-softened Europe; the Polish-Soviet war in ~1920.
Proud boys don't use guns or violence for the most part. They've been a bit of a paper tiger, especially after the fuckery in their leadership. Brownshirts ARE still comparable to antifa; there is literally 0 reason there couldn't be two antifa-like groups fighting each other.
No, you can't just point to a 10 hour documentary as "source" for individual claims. That'd be like me pointing to "internet" as a source. IF you MUST find me individual timestamps in the documentary, but I would rather a stronger source than a shoddy obvious propaganda piece.
God's work my friend. Keep spreading the truth. One day, no one will be able to deny it.
Well said!
Never pay attention to what is being said. Pay attention to what is being done.
Frame this quote
Hit it on the head again! Its rare to see someone that actually knows the truth and sees these people for what they really are.
Both are evil. Both were socialist. Both killed millions brutally.
Intelligence was gathered by the Polish underground and transmitted to the allies which detailed gas chambers long before the Soviets set foot on that soil.
The Pilecki report is probably the chief example.
This intelligence was largely ignored. No aid was provided from the Western Allies.
Pilecki went on to fight against the communist regime for many years before being caught and executed. He was no communist, as others have tried to counter with.
Was the truth exactly like the narrative? Likely not. The Soviets committed atrocities of their own and likely attempted to suppress or cover some up as German atrocities, just as the Germans did with the Soviets.
Nonetheless, there is documentation of extensive German atrocities during the war.
Comparing this with voter fraud is a way over-simplification.
I linked the Pilecki report. he was a Polish underground leader who infiltrated the camps and collected info with his fellow patriots for a fair amount of time, and repeatedly smuggled it out to the rest of the underground whom transmitted it to the British, who appear to have kept it pretty quiet.
I presume they did not release or make a big deal about the information to avoid pressure from the public to act on the information for probably two reasons:
Here is one English translation of the report that I have located: https://archive.org/details/WITOLDREPORT/page/n7/mode/2up I don't know Polish so I can't personally verify the accuracy of the translation, however I do have friends that do speak Polish and have verified it.
For what it's worth, the Polish Underground he was a founding member of was one that was in opposition to the other underground organization that was pro-Communist, funded by the Soviets. After the war, he maintained his underground infrastructure and fought the communist regime until they captured him, tried him, and executed him for "fascism". He was certainly NOT a communist.
You're doing a good job spreading jewish propaganda. You're doing EXACTLY what they want you to do. Keep it up sheep, they love a good servant.
This is the truth! The sheep just refuse to believe it.
And Soros, Nazi himself, is the Rothschild strong arm, doing their bidding, as they themselves financed the nazis, at the time.
He helped the nazis to sell off his own family and people.
None if this is true
good one rabbi! working hard on the sabbath I see. Shalom!
What I know. It's the deep-seated against us. Always was always will be until we win.
You're a sheep.
the books that were burned were TRANSGENDER THEORY and perverted bullshit
even teenvouge admits this FACT
Nazi culture sucked
Their capitol city (and entire country) was in ruins just a few years after they came to power. They destroyed their own country because they couldn't control their hate and revenge
Nobody forced germany to invade poland. Nobody forced germany to declare war on the US. You're brainwashed by nazi propaganda
and the ones that weren't immediately useful to the US went to South America.