First of all: you can blabber on honored jargon, but that does not make you a certified knowledgeable scientist. Anyone on here can claim anything.
Dozens of highly educated and well established virologist do not share your view.
Second:
somehow escape the body, somehow enter into another body (apparently by teleportation) somehow cross into the bloodstream, somehow make it to a cell that is expressing the ACE-2 protein, and then somehow aligns with that protein, and then somehow do anything except cause that single receptor to shut down
Yet, you are willing to go with the narrative that natural "viruses" somehow spread from person to person without ANY evidence. All the evidence you have is concurrence, coincidental data. The only viruses that spread from person to person are designed to do that.
Third:
Any jabbed person is a spike protein factory. It get's into sperm, ovaries, lympfnodes, saliva, brain.
That it influences people with whom a test subject has close contact is even mentioned in the Pfizer contra-indications. You are neglecting a major implication.
You are appealing to the McCLintock effect, yet you have no evidence for it's pathway. You are reaching and you have no evidence.
Dozens of highly educated and well established virologist do not share your view.
Please point out one virologist (not MD, but actual scientist) who says they think the spike protein is shedding and causing problems and presents an argument or evidence for how that is happening.
Just one argument, or one piece of evidence, by one actual scientist.
Just one.
Yet, you are willing to go with the narrative that natural "viruses" somehow spread from person to person without ANY evidence.
There is a ridiculous amount of evidence that viruses spread.
Here is a paper that looks at mask efficacy in an outbreak of H1N1 (or some flu variant, I'd have to look it up by I'm busy finding evidence for you). It show quite clearly that masks don't work to stop the spread of a virus. (Note: "stop the spread of a virus").
Note: I am getting more stuff. I posted accidentally mid gathering. You have way too many things to respond to! At least you didn't put them all in one post.
First of all: you can blabber on honored jargon, but that does not make you a certified knowledgeable scientist. Anyone on here can claim anything.
Dozens of highly educated and well established virologist do not share your view.
Second:
Yet, you are willing to go with the narrative that natural "viruses" somehow spread from person to person without ANY evidence. All the evidence you have is concurrence, coincidental data. The only viruses that spread from person to person are designed to do that.
Third: Any jabbed person is a spike protein factory. It get's into sperm, ovaries, lympfnodes, saliva, brain.
That it influences people with whom a test subject has close contact is even mentioned in the Pfizer contra-indications. You are neglecting a major implication.
You are appealing to the McCLintock effect, yet you have no evidence for it's pathway. You are reaching and you have no evidence.
THAT is by FAR the most likely explanation.
That leaves us with the observation as is.
By Fauci shill.
Please point out one virologist (not MD, but actual scientist) who says they think the spike protein is shedding and causing problems and presents an argument or evidence for how that is happening.
Just one argument, or one piece of evidence, by one actual scientist.
Just one.
There is a ridiculous amount of evidence that viruses spread.
Here is a paper that looks at mask efficacy in an outbreak of H1N1 (or some flu variant, I'd have to look it up by I'm busy finding evidence for you). It show quite clearly that masks don't work to stop the spread of a virus. (Note: "stop the spread of a virus").
Note: I am getting more stuff. I posted accidentally mid gathering. You have way too many things to respond to! At least you didn't put them all in one post.
Seriously?
challenges such as these in this time and age are a clear demonstration of you being a shill.