Ah ... now we have here Slyver the authority on what can and cannot be done.
It is really funny.
First you come up here and claim to be something, and then devolve to what other people can and cannot do to discuss an item among themselves. Your words betray who your master really is.
Actually I presented an argument. That was the main thing I did. You are focusing on completely different things than anything that was important.
then devolve to what other people can and cannot do to discuss
You only want to find flaws (mostly that don't have anything to do with reality). You obviously do not want to have an actual conversation. Thank you for your time.
An argument without evidence can be rejected out of hand. An argument rejected does not remain standing.
Rejecting an argument out of hand is only done by someone who either;
A) doesn't understand the argument
B) can't reject it with their own argument
C) has no respect for the speaker.
Those are not exclusive reasons.
In every case they have nothing to do with the argument being bad, only with the rejecter being ignorant or an asshole.
Ah ... now we have here Slyver the authority on what can and cannot be done.
It is really funny.
First you come up here and claim to be something, and then devolve to what other people can and cannot do to discuss an item among themselves. Your words betray who your master really is.
Actually I presented an argument. That was the main thing I did. You are focusing on completely different things than anything that was important.
You only want to find flaws (mostly that don't have anything to do with reality). You obviously do not want to have an actual conversation. Thank you for your time.