note: you have no evidence as this is an experiment. And by turning the burden of proof around, you hope to get away with it. The JAB is NOT the default position. YOU have to proof viability.
Has reading comprehension completely left the building?
You think I helped create the vaccine?
You think I am pro vaccine?
I have been screaming from the roof tops about how bad these vaccines are for over half a year (before they came out). Because I looked at the design and noted several flaws. I knew they would be non-targeting and get everywhere (which is their primary problem). I knew they would be able to cross the BBB. I knew they were untested, which is always bad for large scale distribution.
This is all before they even came out.
Since they have come out I have been screaming about how they are killing people. How they are causing serious adverse effects in the hundreds of thousands of people. How they are likely more harmful by the data than the virus itself. How the death data is almost certainly underreported for the vaccines (and overreported for the virus).
Blah, blah, blah. I write about this stuff almost every day. I am writing a paper on it right now.
I am about as anti-(this)vaccine as a person can be.
What I am not is afraid about things for which there is no good evidence. I have looked at the evidence. Almost certainly something is happening, but there is no good evidence whatsoever that it is the spike protein itself. I personally think this is a disinformation campaign (aka a black hat attack).
Note: I welcome (beg for) any and all evidence if you have any to present that I have not already vetted.
I am also not afraid of something for which there is another viable explanation that fits all the evidence that does exist. I'm not afraid of something for which there is no biological nor physical chemistry path in my more than a decade of experience in the field that supports the claims.
I'm not afraid of the spike protein shedding. I have tried to explain why. People seem to want to ignore my arguments for it despite the fact that they are really good arguments. I realize they can be complicated, but they can be vetted with independent research. Please look it up, or ask another expert in the field, to analyze my protests in the specifics.
SHOW ME THE EVIDENCE THE JAB YOU HELPED CREATE
is
ECOLOGICALLY SAFE
PROTECTS AGAINST SARSCOV-2
DOES NOT MAKE PEOPLE SICK
DOES NOT CAUSE DEATH.
DEFEATS SARSCOV-2
SARSCOV-2 TO BE NOT LAB CREATED.
note: you have no evidence as this is an experiment. And by turning the burden of proof around, you hope to get away with it. The JAB is NOT the default position. YOU have to proof viability.
Good luck with that.
What the holy fuck?
Has reading comprehension completely left the building?
You think I helped create the vaccine?
You think I am pro vaccine?
I have been screaming from the roof tops about how bad these vaccines are for over half a year (before they came out). Because I looked at the design and noted several flaws. I knew they would be non-targeting and get everywhere (which is their primary problem). I knew they would be able to cross the BBB. I knew they were untested, which is always bad for large scale distribution.
This is all before they even came out.
Since they have come out I have been screaming about how they are killing people. How they are causing serious adverse effects in the hundreds of thousands of people. How they are likely more harmful by the data than the virus itself. How the death data is almost certainly underreported for the vaccines (and overreported for the virus).
Blah, blah, blah. I write about this stuff almost every day. I am writing a paper on it right now.
I am about as anti-(this)vaccine as a person can be.
What I am not is afraid about things for which there is no good evidence. I have looked at the evidence. Almost certainly something is happening, but there is no good evidence whatsoever that it is the spike protein itself. I personally think this is a disinformation campaign (aka a black hat attack).
Note: I welcome (beg for) any and all evidence if you have any to present that I have not already vetted.
I am also not afraid of something for which there is another viable explanation that fits all the evidence that does exist. I'm not afraid of something for which there is no biological nor physical chemistry path in my more than a decade of experience in the field that supports the claims.
I'm not afraid of the spike protein shedding. I have tried to explain why. People seem to want to ignore my arguments for it despite the fact that they are really good arguments. I realize they can be complicated, but they can be vetted with independent research. Please look it up, or ask another expert in the field, to analyze my protests in the specifics.
Read what you wrote.
Instead of complaining about reading ability, you may want to complain to yourself for writing ability.