There is no evidence of vaccine shedding. All reports seem to be of menstrual sympathy, which is a pheromone response.
Nevertheless, NAC looks promising as a prophylactic or curative for the virus and possibly against the some of the harmful effects of the vaccine itself, if taken before and/or for a couple weeks after getting the vaccine.
First of all, what he said had no basis in cell biology reality (see below).
Second, he said "in miniscule amounts". So you believe he must be telling the truth about it shedding (because it fits your fear of it) but then don't believe he is telling the truth about the scale (because it doesn't fit your fear of it).
That makes perfect sense, if you use fear to guide your reasoning.
I am a cell biologist and bio-nanotechnology researcher in a field related to the vaccines. There is no biological basis for a transmembrane protein to escape the lipid bilayer it is locked into, somehow escape the body, somehow enter into another body (apparently by teleportation) somehow cross into the bloodstream, somehow make it to a cell that is expressing the ACE-2 protein, and then somehow aligns with that protein, and then somehow do anything except cause that single receptor to shut down. That would do NOTHING to a whole cell, and less than nothing to the tissue it lives in.
So you understand, transmembrane proteins of the type that is the SARS S protein can't escape the membrane. it just doesn't happen. Even if they did, the lipid bilayer is essential for the structure and function, requiring both mechanical forces and the hydrophobic environment only existing within the lipid bilayer. So if it escaped, it would instantly unfold and would form some other structure. Considering that the ACE-2 ligand part of the S protein is dependent on the S Proteins tertiary structure, which instantly changes if it miraculously escaped the membrane, there is virtually no way it is still capable of activating the ACE-2 receptor even if all the other 10 miracles happened that got it into another persons body and interfacing with the right cell in the right orientation.
From the perspective of someone who does research in these things, the concept is beyond ludicrous that the S protein is "shedding" and making people sick.
Considering all "sickness" it is causing is related to menstruation, and menstrual sympathy has been a thing forever, and the vaccine itself has been shown to accumulate in the ovaries, BY FAR the most likely explanation is a pheromone response causing menstrual sympathy.
He said that the spike protein sheds (as a fact), and then offers his thought (a hypothesis) that the shedding is minor.
He said that it sheds. He invented it.
Edit to add: Everyone assumed that the injection stays at the injection site too... and it doesn't... and now we discover that not only does it spread throughout the body, it also has the ability to cross the blood / brain barrier... so, shedding is truly not out of the realm of possibility, despite you trying to convolute and confuse with your Cell Biology terminology.
Everyone assumed that the injection stays at the injection site too... and it doesn't
When people were saying this, I was saying that there was NO POSSIBLE WAY it was remaining at the injection site. Such an idea was ludicrous. I made protest after protest about the design of the vaccines and how they would easily enter the cardiovascular and lymphatic systems and spread everywhere.
Which was completely obvious to me because I have designed lipid nanoparticles for cell specific targeting drug delivery...
So I know a thing or two about what is going on.
despite you trying to convolute and confuse with your Cell Biology terminology.
If what I said was confusing I apologize. I was trying to be specific and accurate. It is difficult to explain how ludicrous some of the ideas are without getting into the nitty gritty.
it also has the ability to cross the blood / brain barrier
Of course it does. I said that from the beginning. We create PEGylated lipid nanoparticles of that specific size precisely because they CAN cross the BBB.
so, shedding is truly not out of the realm of possibility
Just because someone else got a completely unrelated thing wrong, doesn't mean that this is also wrong. That is a logical fallacy.
There is no evidence of vaccine shedding. All reports seem to be of menstrual sympathy, which is a pheromone response.
Nevertheless, NAC looks promising as a prophylactic or curative for the virus and possibly against the some of the harmful effects of the vaccine itself, if taken before and/or for a couple weeks after getting the vaccine.
Oh, I dunno... The inventor seems to think they can...
https://greatawakening.win/p/12ih0RwtBH/mrna-inventor-censored-for-confi/c/
First of all, what he said had no basis in cell biology reality (see below).
Second, he said "in miniscule amounts". So you believe he must be telling the truth about it shedding (because it fits your fear of it) but then don't believe he is telling the truth about the scale (because it doesn't fit your fear of it).
That makes perfect sense, if you use fear to guide your reasoning.
I am a cell biologist and bio-nanotechnology researcher in a field related to the vaccines. There is no biological basis for a transmembrane protein to escape the lipid bilayer it is locked into, somehow escape the body, somehow enter into another body (apparently by teleportation) somehow cross into the bloodstream, somehow make it to a cell that is expressing the ACE-2 protein, and then somehow aligns with that protein, and then somehow do anything except cause that single receptor to shut down. That would do NOTHING to a whole cell, and less than nothing to the tissue it lives in.
So you understand, transmembrane proteins of the type that is the SARS S protein can't escape the membrane. it just doesn't happen. Even if they did, the lipid bilayer is essential for the structure and function, requiring both mechanical forces and the hydrophobic environment only existing within the lipid bilayer. So if it escaped, it would instantly unfold and would form some other structure. Considering that the ACE-2 ligand part of the S protein is dependent on the S Proteins tertiary structure, which instantly changes if it miraculously escaped the membrane, there is virtually no way it is still capable of activating the ACE-2 receptor even if all the other 10 miracles happened that got it into another persons body and interfacing with the right cell in the right orientation.
From the perspective of someone who does research in these things, the concept is beyond ludicrous that the S protein is "shedding" and making people sick.
Considering all "sickness" it is causing is related to menstruation, and menstrual sympathy has been a thing forever, and the vaccine itself has been shown to accumulate in the ovaries, BY FAR the most likely explanation is a pheromone response causing menstrual sympathy.
No, please don't put words in my mouth.
He said that the spike protein sheds (as a fact), and then offers his thought (a hypothesis) that the shedding is minor.
He said that it sheds. He invented it.
Edit to add: Everyone assumed that the injection stays at the injection site too... and it doesn't... and now we discover that not only does it spread throughout the body, it also has the ability to cross the blood / brain barrier... so, shedding is truly not out of the realm of possibility, despite you trying to convolute and confuse with your Cell Biology terminology.
When people were saying this, I was saying that there was NO POSSIBLE WAY it was remaining at the injection site. Such an idea was ludicrous. I made protest after protest about the design of the vaccines and how they would easily enter the cardiovascular and lymphatic systems and spread everywhere.
Which was completely obvious to me because I have designed lipid nanoparticles for cell specific targeting drug delivery...
So I know a thing or two about what is going on.
If what I said was confusing I apologize. I was trying to be specific and accurate. It is difficult to explain how ludicrous some of the ideas are without getting into the nitty gritty.
Of course it does. I said that from the beginning. We create PEGylated lipid nanoparticles of that specific size precisely because they CAN cross the BBB.
Just because someone else got a completely unrelated thing wrong, doesn't mean that this is also wrong. That is a logical fallacy.