I am sure he is not an idiot. There is a reason why coronavirus wins from SARS/ MERS .....
WE know that sarscov has a survival rate of 99,8%. Ebola has a much lower survival rate and a higher disruption rate. Yet loses from sarscov.
Why?
How far out can you sustain a plandemic on a real epidemic?
This is chosen not for it's lethality, or it's disruptive nature, but for the possibility to reimagine society. Sarscov is the Elite virus, the weapon of choice.
It is about power acquisition, projection and full spectrum domination.
That is my thinking. A severe virulent is too unpredictable and you run the risk of killing yourself. Also, if it kills everything around you quickly, it is not as efficient tool for your long range plans....
I am sure he is not an idiot. There is a reason why coronavirus wins from SARS/ MERS .....
WE know that sarscov has a survival rate of 99,8%. Ebola has a much lower survival rate and a higher disruption rate. Yet loses from sarscov.
Why?
How far out can you sustain a plandemic on a real epidemic?
This is chosen not for it's lethality, or it's disruptive nature, but for the possibility to reimagine society. Sarscov is the Elite virus, the weapon of choice.
It is about power acquisition, projection and full spectrum domination.
That is my thinking. A severe virulent is too unpredictable and you run the risk of killing yourself. Also, if it kills everything around you quickly, it is not as efficient tool for your long range plans....
That's a good explanation.
Gives us a change to reimagine society as it should be.
Without them.