But we still don't need a vax for this highly treatable illness. Also, there are adjuvants in that one which are suspected to have caused problems; it lists Matrix M. Also: "Novavax uses a lab-made version of the spike protein of the original coronavirus to train the immune system to produce antibodies.". So we still have the problem of spike proteins floating around. (Now whether these spikes behave the same way as has been seen w/the other CV vax's, we need to look at their study data...if they released any).
Novovax has the lab-made version of the spike, so it's a protein in the vax, not the mRNA to make the protein. It's more like a 'traditional vax' then, but should vax's contain a toxic product? All other vax's had/have attenuated (weakened) viruses, inactivated viruses, or viral proteins, and these by themselves are not directly toxic like the spike protein is.
I don't believe we need any kind of vax, but the novovax sounds like it could be less harmful than the mRNA or DNA vaxes because the body can examine the spike proteins, make the anitbodies to an appropriate level, then dispose of the spike proteins because there are no instructions to make more.
It would be like being on the receiving end of 'spike protein shedding' which is preferable to taking the mRNA or DNA vaxes, where the body just keeps churning out spike proteins and labelling all it's own cells with them. That leads to immune system burn out (I think) and also to autoimmune disease because the body attacks its own tissues marked with spike protein in the cell membrane.
Just to repeat, nobody needs novovax when there are non immunological treatments like ivermectin, HCQ
But we still don't need a vax for this highly treatable illness. Also, there are adjuvants in that one which are suspected to have caused problems; it lists Matrix M. Also: "Novavax uses a lab-made version of the spike protein of the original coronavirus to train the immune system to produce antibodies.". So we still have the problem of spike proteins floating around. (Now whether these spikes behave the same way as has been seen w/the other CV vax's, we need to look at their study data...if they released any).
https://observer.com/2021/04/novavaxs-covid-vaccine-near-approval-malaria-flu-progress/
(Matrix M DDG search isn't showing up anything yet, needs more digging for sauce; also more digging for its spike protein characteristics).
That means it's still an mRNA vax. It's the use of the S-Protein that is key here. Now [they]'re just flat out lying.
Novovax has the lab-made version of the spike, so it's a protein in the vax, not the mRNA to make the protein. It's more like a 'traditional vax' then, but should vax's contain a toxic product? All other vax's had/have attenuated (weakened) viruses, inactivated viruses, or viral proteins, and these by themselves are not directly toxic like the spike protein is.
I don't believe we need any kind of vax, but the novovax sounds like it could be less harmful than the mRNA or DNA vaxes because the body can examine the spike proteins, make the anitbodies to an appropriate level, then dispose of the spike proteins because there are no instructions to make more.
It would be like being on the receiving end of 'spike protein shedding' which is preferable to taking the mRNA or DNA vaxes, where the body just keeps churning out spike proteins and labelling all it's own cells with them. That leads to immune system burn out (I think) and also to autoimmune disease because the body attacks its own tissues marked with spike protein in the cell membrane.
Just to repeat, nobody needs novovax when there are non immunological treatments like ivermectin, HCQ