But we still don't need a vax for this highly treatable illness. Also, there are adjuvants in that one which are suspected to have caused problems; it lists Matrix M. Also: "Novavax uses a lab-made version of the spike protein of the original coronavirus to train the immune system to produce antibodies.". So we still have the problem of spike proteins floating around. (Now whether these spikes behave the same way as has been seen w/the other CV vax's, we need to look at their study data...if they released any).
Novovax has the lab-made version of the spike, so it's a protein in the vax, not the mRNA to make the protein. It's more like a 'traditional vax' then, but should vax's contain a toxic product? All other vax's had/have attenuated (weakened) viruses, inactivated viruses, or viral proteins, and these by themselves are not directly toxic like the spike protein is.
I don't believe we need any kind of vax, but the novovax sounds like it could be less harmful than the mRNA or DNA vaxes because the body can examine the spike proteins, make the anitbodies to an appropriate level, then dispose of the spike proteins because there are no instructions to make more.
It would be like being on the receiving end of 'spike protein shedding' which is preferable to taking the mRNA or DNA vaxes, where the body just keeps churning out spike proteins and labelling all it's own cells with them. That leads to immune system burn out (I think) and also to autoimmune disease because the body attacks its own tissues marked with spike protein in the cell membrane.
Just to repeat, nobody needs novovax when there are non immunological treatments like ivermectin, HCQ
I was never anti-vax, had the small pox and probably polio as a kid but very rarely ever took the flu vax. What I'm learning now, not sure any of it was actually valid. from what I've seen, all of those viruses were on the way down by the time the vaxes came out.
With cancer and autism spiking after they went into major use ... they might be on to something. Doubt I'll ever get another one again without clearer proof they work.
There you go. Try searching with : "Matrix M adjuvants contents".
Note the following quote:
Named from the Latin "adiuvare" meaning "to help," adjuvants have been lending a helping hand to vaccinologists for many decades. Yet a lack of a clear understanding of how they work has tainted their reputation, leading to epithets such as "alchemy" and "the immunologist's dirty secret".
The concept emerged in 1925 when Gaston Ramon, a French vet, discovered that horses vaccinated against diphtheria had a stronger immune response** if inflammation developed at the site of injection. **Ramon then set out to test a range of common materials and foodstuffs for their ability to cause irritation and inflammation as vaccine additives
So, the idea is to make you sicker, while you are sick, to cure you.
or ...
What does not kill you, makes you stronger.
This is the essence of modern medicine.
Compare that to traditional medicine practice where you are sick and the cause of the disease is remediated.
Thanks redtoe and raggedyman. What I was specifically looking for were bad events with that adjuvant. Some adjuvants are molecularly similar to human proteins and incite an autoimmune response, like squalene. I vaguely remember reading 'Matrix M' was a new name given to an older 'bad' adjuvant, but that source escapes me now. Maybe something with Gulf War Syndrome suspected to be linked to an adjuvant in a military-mandated vaccine?
But we still don't need a vax for this highly treatable illness. Also, there are adjuvants in that one which are suspected to have caused problems; it lists Matrix M. Also: "Novavax uses a lab-made version of the spike protein of the original coronavirus to train the immune system to produce antibodies.". So we still have the problem of spike proteins floating around. (Now whether these spikes behave the same way as has been seen w/the other CV vax's, we need to look at their study data...if they released any).
https://observer.com/2021/04/novavaxs-covid-vaccine-near-approval-malaria-flu-progress/
(Matrix M DDG search isn't showing up anything yet, needs more digging for sauce; also more digging for its spike protein characteristics).
That means it's still an mRNA vax. It's the use of the S-Protein that is key here. Now [they]'re just flat out lying.
Novovax has the lab-made version of the spike, so it's a protein in the vax, not the mRNA to make the protein. It's more like a 'traditional vax' then, but should vax's contain a toxic product? All other vax's had/have attenuated (weakened) viruses, inactivated viruses, or viral proteins, and these by themselves are not directly toxic like the spike protein is.
I don't believe we need any kind of vax, but the novovax sounds like it could be less harmful than the mRNA or DNA vaxes because the body can examine the spike proteins, make the anitbodies to an appropriate level, then dispose of the spike proteins because there are no instructions to make more.
It would be like being on the receiving end of 'spike protein shedding' which is preferable to taking the mRNA or DNA vaxes, where the body just keeps churning out spike proteins and labelling all it's own cells with them. That leads to immune system burn out (I think) and also to autoimmune disease because the body attacks its own tissues marked with spike protein in the cell membrane.
Just to repeat, nobody needs novovax when there are non immunological treatments like ivermectin, HCQ
Does this mean that Novavax is using their own delivery vehicle?
I was never anti-vax, had the small pox and probably polio as a kid but very rarely ever took the flu vax. What I'm learning now, not sure any of it was actually valid. from what I've seen, all of those viruses were on the way down by the time the vaxes came out.
With cancer and autism spiking after they went into major use ... they might be on to something. Doubt I'll ever get another one again without clearer proof they work.
Does this help? There is data in there but way beyond my understanding.
https://ir.novavax.com/news-releases/news-release-details/novavax-covid-19-vaccine-demonstrates-90-overall-efficacy-and
Help in what way, reprogramming your DNA?
Help to understand the technology being used.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29594879/
https://go.drugbank.com/drugs/DB16369
Lancet at it again: A non-peer-reviewed study: https://www.precisionvaccinations.com/vaccines/r21-matrix-m-malaria-vaccine https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00943-0/fulltext
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-20653-8
There you go. Try searching with : "Matrix M adjuvants contents".
Note the following quote:
So, the idea is to make you sicker, while you are sick, to cure you. or ...
What does not kill you, makes you stronger.
This is the essence of modern medicine.
Compare that to traditional medicine practice where you are sick and the cause of the disease is remediated.
Added:
https://fda.report/DailyMed/5b237fbc-d58a-4ca0-a56b-f9425d14dab5
"modern medicine" = Rockefeller Medicine = bad for humans
Thanks redtoe and raggedyman. What I was specifically looking for were bad events with that adjuvant. Some adjuvants are molecularly similar to human proteins and incite an autoimmune response, like squalene. I vaguely remember reading 'Matrix M' was a new name given to an older 'bad' adjuvant, but that source escapes me now. Maybe something with Gulf War Syndrome suspected to be linked to an adjuvant in a military-mandated vaccine?
They should then be in vaers. I am under the impression this to be a booster shot.
I have not had time to dissect it.