I don't believe she was killed later, I was just suggesting it was possible and why someone would be motivated to do it. Pure conjecture.
Why on earth would they kill the others who were there? They are not causing trouble. To kill any of them would arouse suspicion. It would not be strategic.
You seem to have come to your conclusions by believing what others tell you and show you, instead of doing concrete research.
Gaslighting again. I told you I didn't do this.
Why are you so exercised about what I think anyway ?
There's also the chance that she sprouted wings and flew away. If we are to include all possibilities, it gets us further than the truth. Eventually it has to come down to probability.
If she were a crisis actor, MANY other things need to also line up for this to take place. All her past relationships, husband, family, parents, kids, childhood friends...all have to be factored in. If she were a crisis actor, did any of them know? If she's not dead, does her family know? her friends?
Some that were in the room are getting arrested now, so why wouldn't they speak out, even if they had no proof themselves? Wouldn't that get more of the public on their side that something fishy is going on? It wouldn't make sense for them to stay silent.
Why shouldn't we exclude it when it is so unlikely that it's true? Why entertain something that is entirely based on speculation?
Ah I see. Okay well I'm not sure why you'd suggest the possibility, and even fight for it, when there is little evidence to suggest that it's true.
You said earlier that they may have killed Babbitt because she was a loose end. If that's true, then therefore those that witnessed the fake death would also be loose ends, since they would know the truth. So there is an inconsistency.
I'm not exercised about what you think, you're free to think what you want. I'm just confused how/why you come to your conclusions without evidence.
It's like if someone claims that the 20 year old cashier at the grocery store is actually a robot, or something wild like that. If your neighbor or peer informs you of a bombshell claim like that, you'd be curious as to why right? It seems so unbelievable, you'd want to know, what is it that makes you think that your cashier is a robot? What have they done to make that a possibility?
That's all. What you're claiming seems very outlandish to me, and I'm just confused on why you (and others) come to these conclusions, but I suppose it all comes down to "because I think so." That's fine, I guess I just don't operate like that.
There's always the chance that she was disappeared later.
I'm not even suggesting it. I am just asking people no to exclude the possibility.
I'm not fighting for this viewpoint. I don't believe it. It's just a possibility to be considered if she were a crisis actor.
Here is why that possibility might exist:
If she were a crisis actor on the day (likely) and then killed later (possible), then there would likely be no footage or proof of the later killing. She would just be missing, not proven killed. The advantage of killing her is that she can then not appear in public or in court later, obviously disproving the original killing on the 6th. his is just a guess, based on the criminal behavior and lack of loyalty of the cabal
Those that were there in the stairwell and might tell of a fake death could tell of it now.
If they don't have hard proof, they likely won't be believed by the public except possibly in court, it won't be covered in the MSM. To kill them would bring more scrutiny. It would not be strategic.
I'm not suggesting it as likely. I don't fight for this explanation. I fight for it not to be excluded for completeness.
I don't believe she was killed later, I was just suggesting it was possible and why someone would be motivated to do it. Pure conjecture.
Why on earth would they kill the others who were there? They are not causing trouble. To kill any of them would arouse suspicion. It would not be strategic.
Gaslighting again. I told you I didn't do this.
Why are you so exercised about what I think anyway ?
There's also the chance that she sprouted wings and flew away. If we are to include all possibilities, it gets us further than the truth. Eventually it has to come down to probability.
If she were a crisis actor, MANY other things need to also line up for this to take place. All her past relationships, husband, family, parents, kids, childhood friends...all have to be factored in. If she were a crisis actor, did any of them know? If she's not dead, does her family know? her friends?
Some that were in the room are getting arrested now, so why wouldn't they speak out, even if they had no proof themselves? Wouldn't that get more of the public on their side that something fishy is going on? It wouldn't make sense for them to stay silent.
Why shouldn't we exclude it when it is so unlikely that it's true? Why entertain something that is entirely based on speculation?
Ah I see. Okay well I'm not sure why you'd suggest the possibility, and even fight for it, when there is little evidence to suggest that it's true.
You said earlier that they may have killed Babbitt because she was a loose end. If that's true, then therefore those that witnessed the fake death would also be loose ends, since they would know the truth. So there is an inconsistency.
I'm not exercised about what you think, you're free to think what you want. I'm just confused how/why you come to your conclusions without evidence.
It's like if someone claims that the 20 year old cashier at the grocery store is actually a robot, or something wild like that. If your neighbor or peer informs you of a bombshell claim like that, you'd be curious as to why right? It seems so unbelievable, you'd want to know, what is it that makes you think that your cashier is a robot? What have they done to make that a possibility?
That's all. What you're claiming seems very outlandish to me, and I'm just confused on why you (and others) come to these conclusions, but I suppose it all comes down to "because I think so." That's fine, I guess I just don't operate like that.
Here's my first comment
I'm not even suggesting it. I am just asking people no to exclude the possibility.
I'm not fighting for this viewpoint. I don't believe it. It's just a possibility to be considered if she were a crisis actor.
Here is why that possibility might exist:
If she were a crisis actor on the day (likely) and then killed later (possible), then there would likely be no footage or proof of the later killing. She would just be missing, not proven killed. The advantage of killing her is that she can then not appear in public or in court later, obviously disproving the original killing on the 6th. his is just a guess, based on the criminal behavior and lack of loyalty of the cabal
Those that were there in the stairwell and might tell of a fake death could tell of it now. If they don't have hard proof, they likely won't be believed by the public except possibly in court, it won't be covered in the MSM. To kill them would bring more scrutiny. It would not be strategic.
I'm not suggesting it as likely. I don't fight for this explanation. I fight for it not to be excluded for completeness.