Unlike everyone else on this thread so it would appear, I understand what you're saying and it makes sense, if it's true. Do you have sources for me? (on like, photoestrogens replacing estrogen production, and them being weaker?)
I'm lactose intolerant so I've considered trying various substitutes because I used to love drinking milk, but I'm reluctant given stuff people have said about soy in particular.
I get what you are saying. The the real question is, will your body create more receptors to balance out the weaker phytoestrogens. Your body is constantly trying to balamce out. your hormones. So if weaker phytoestrogens use the estrogen receptors, wouldn't your body create new receptors to balance out your hormonal level. Hence once the phytoestrogens are used up, your body will have a shot ton more estrogen receptors, at lleastfor a while while it balances out again?
Sounds like you have whopper tits
Im not saying people should eat garbage fast food. Im simply pointing out the science to clarify a common misconception.
Unlike everyone else on this thread so it would appear, I understand what you're saying and it makes sense, if it's true. Do you have sources for me? (on like, photoestrogens replacing estrogen production, and them being weaker?)
I'm lactose intolerant so I've considered trying various substitutes because I used to love drinking milk, but I'm reluctant given stuff people have said about soy in particular.
I get what you are saying. The the real question is, will your body create more receptors to balance out the weaker phytoestrogens. Your body is constantly trying to balamce out. your hormones. So if weaker phytoestrogens use the estrogen receptors, wouldn't your body create new receptors to balance out your hormonal level. Hence once the phytoestrogens are used up, your body will have a shot ton more estrogen receptors, at lleastfor a while while it balances out again?