The FBI set the fake 'coup' Jan 6th to justify why many of the Senators, (including many RINOs who betrayed our party) and Pence would go on with a 'clear conscience' to state that there was no need to investigate the voter fraud, and accepting the electoral votes without a question.
What happens if it was actually an FBI agent posing as a Capitol Police who shot and killed Ashli Babbitt? Thus the reason for why the name of who shot her is STILL anonymous. And if they do name who killed Ashli, will it even be the right person? I don't think so. They wanted a full-blown Civil War to start right at the steps of the Capitol. They had actors go scream on the media that they killed a woman Trump supporter....hoping to stir up the Trump base. They didn't get what they were desiring for. So they twisted and manipulated the story to make it sound like what happened at the Capitol was so horrendous when it was basically nothing.
The FBI killed Ashli Babbitt. The FBI was the coup. The FBI committed treason. Antifa IS part of the FBI.
I see where you are coming from, but the Bible really is quite silent about what Jesus’ spirit was doing after he died. And what do you make of the parable of Lazarus and the wicked rich man?
A parable, like the one of the rich man, is a short symbolic (but not literal) story designed to teach some principle or lesson. They are a teaching method that involves a comparison. They use situations, events and circumstances known to those being taught to, like a bridge, to teach them a principle or convey a meaning that it not understood. In Jesus' case, he used parables to convey spiritual truths and, in the case of the rich man and Lazarus, as correction. By their very nature they are NOT to be taken literally true in every detail. Jesus' use of parables was not uncommon. The Jewish Rabbis of his day commonly used them as teaching tools. This is in part why he used them to correct the Pharisees (self-righteous religious leaders) who were unjustly criticizing what he taught.
"what Jesus’ spirit was doing after he died."
John 19.28-30
After this, Jesus, knowing that all was now finished, said “I thirst.” A jar full of sour wine stood there, so they put a sponge full of the sour wine on a hyssop branch and held it to his mouth. When Jesus had received the sour wine, he said, “It is finished,” and he bowed his head and gave up his spirit.
Matt 27.50
Right but gave up his spirit really doesn’t say a whole lot about anything what was going on until the resurrection. Your interpretation seems forced.
As for parables, sure it could be that Jesus was just illustrating a point with a story, but I’m highly doubtful that he’d use blatantly false things to illustrate those points.