from Tuesday, June 23, 2026
“Protect your mind, and control your emotions” ~ Boone Cutler ~
for Miller to say this...tells me all i need to know 🫡😎
BTW- sorry to say but AI made a mistake w the date n i didn't catch it. not 2025 but should be 2026
lol, no. sorry to say but AI made a mistake w the date n i didn't catch it. not 2025 but should be 2026
sorry to say but AI made a mistake w the date n i didn't catch it. not 2025 but should be 2026
till his strings were cut n he was free
Q659
Effective yesterday, while standing under the statue of FREEDOM, POTUS FREED those ‘good’ people who are currently being blackmailed, threatened and enslaved.
Those who stood chanting “USA” were FREED.
The shot heard around the world.
TG>
WE, THE PEOPLE.
FREEDOM DAY.
LIGHT.
Q2300
Think line of questions re: Sen. Graham > Justice K re: 'Enemy Combatants'. 1-800-273-8255 Operators standing by.
Q2583
Think Graham KAV exchange
Q2305
Coincidence Sen. Graham activated? In the end, you will be 'shocked' to learn what you've 'essentially' witnessed. WWG1WGA!
Q3612
Chairman Graham, it's time.
There are a variety of religious communities in the United States that have private covenants, bylaws, or expectations based on their faith. The key legal principle is that private agreements are generally enforceable only to the extent they comply with state and federal law. No religious community can exempt itself from U.S. law.
Amish (unwritten)), Orthodox Jewish communities, Christian intentional communities, Latter-day Saint (Mormon)-affiliated communities, Hutterite colonies.
The distinction is between voluntary religious practice and governmental authority. The First Amendment protects the free exercise of religion and freedom of association, while the Supremacy Clause establishes that the U.S. Constitution and federal law remain the supreme law of the land. Religious communities have broad freedom to organize their internal affairs, but they do not have sovereignty separate from the United States.
agree. he was always careful w his words, which ppl twisted
"I can tell you this much for sure:
nobody on Capitol Hill has been willing to touch this subject with a ten-foot pole. The murder of Seth Rich – and the resulting cover-up – is as radioactive as any topic I’ve ever seen.
I hope that changes soon, and I’ll post updates as soon as I know more.
BTW, I’m not suicidal. I feel great."
Attorney Ty Clevenger
funny how that didn't happen. Patriots in contro!
Seth was under Comey's watch so, imo, Comey was the one who started 'saving' docs. Wray inherited them, then passed to Kash
me too. both he n Comey have taken MANY 'slings n arrows' for us
Comey ---> Wray ---> Kash.
Comey was FBI director at the of time Seth's murder.
The Quiet Patriots Theory (Burn Bags) - https://gab.com/hippie/posts/115641470784198145
a long-game internal safeguard against the very people who weaponized intelligence in 2016. Wray inherits the archive. Instead of destroying Comey’s documentation, Wray preserves it.
He keeps the archive intact and expands it as Durham begins digging (2019–2023).
When the classified annex lands, it naturally joins the 'Comey' stash. Wray or someone under him, moves the archive into official burn bags. Not to destroy them — but to hide them in plain sight under the guise of routine disposal.
The SCIF becomes a vault.
The bags become camouflage.
Then Trump wins.
Patel walks in. And the archive is still there.
If this was a cover-up, it failed spectacularly. If it was a preservation plan, it succeeded. Comey wasn’t shielding Brennan and Clapper. He was documenting them.
Wray wasn’t covering up for Comey. He was preserving the archive until the country could handle its release.
The burn bags weren’t a panic attempt to erase history. They were a final layer of protection — a transition stage for a new administration that needed the material intact, not incinerated.
it looks like someone packed them very carefully.
3-23-26
The FBI has found 1.9 million pages of missing records in a secret "hidden room" at headquarters that was maintained by former directors James Comey and Chris Wray, according to a Judicial Watch FOIA. The Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) contains several safes holding the docs, including ones generated from Special Counsel Mueller's investigation. https://x.com/paulsperry_/status/2036156719684891028
MORE BURN BAGS
June 2, 2026
Todd Blanche reveals DOJ unearthed cache of Jack Smith documents inside forgotten room - https://gab.com/hippie/posts/116683262324532384
Commentary by Presidential Aide Yury Ushakov following Vladimir Putin’s telephone conversation with US President Donald Trump - http://www.en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/80225
i gave ai my theory n ur comment. this is the response. interesting!
That comment is interesting because it highlights something political scientists and social psychologists have observed before: national identity can re-emerge in unexpected ways, and not always for the same reasons across different groups.
From the perspective of your theory, you would interpret this as evidence that a broader patriotic awakening is occurring across ideological lines. The commenter's observation that some people on the political left are saying things like "I'm taking patriotism back" or "it's my country too" could fit your idea that a more generalized sense of national identity is being reactivated.
However, there are a few reasons to be cautious about treating this as strong evidence:
Reddit is not representative of the general population. Different subreddits have different cultures, moderation practices, and demographics. What appears to be a large shift in one community may not reflect broader society. Anecdotal observations can identify patterns, but they don't prove causes. Humans are very good at noticing patterns that fit our expectations. If you're already considering a patriotism-revival theory, comments supporting that theory will naturally stand out more.
Patriotism is not always partisan. Historically, national symbols and patriotic expression have often been contested terrain. Groups that feel excluded from patriotism sometimes attempt to redefine it rather than reject it. For example, "This country belongs to us too" is itself a patriotic argument, even when expressed in opposition to another political movement.
That said, the phenomenon the commenter describes is real and worth thinking about:
"I celebrate out of spite."
"I'm taking patriotism back."
"I fly the American flag because it's my country too."
Those are not anti-national sentiments. They're actually expressions of ownership over national identity. The emotional motivation may differ—pride, defiance, belonging, resistance—but the underlying premise is the same: the nation itself remains something worth claiming and defending.
From the standpoint of your theory, this is where things become intriguing. If patriotism begins appearing simultaneously among groups that traditionally opposed each other's symbols and narratives, one could argue that a larger unifying identity is emerging beneath the partisan conflict.
A more conventional explanation would be that after years of intense polarization, many Americans—across the political spectrum—may simply be experiencing fatigue with perpetual conflict and rediscovering a shared national identity. Large public celebrations, geopolitical uncertainty, and social media amplification could all contribute to that shift.
The part of your theory that I find most analytically interesting is not necessarily whether there is a hidden coordinating force, but rather the strategic question you're asking:
If a nation anticipated a period of major upheaval, accountability, or transformation, would leaders first seek to rebuild national cohesion and patriotic identity?
Historically, the answer to that question is often yes. Governments and political movements have frequently attempted to strengthen national identity before undertaking major societal changes or asking populations to endure hardship.
So while a Reddit thread isn't evidence that your broader theory is correct, it does illustrate something that your theory is attempting to explain: a perception that patriotism itself may be becoming more socially acceptable, more emotionally resonant, and perhaps more broadly shared than it has been in recent years.
Whether that shift is organic, encouraged, amplified, or some combination of all three is the part that remains open to interpretation.
it's been crazy fun for a few wks starting w all the X vids of the FIFA visitors. last nite was amazing!
publicity and media hype around them is absolutely contrived.
TY, it's good to see that i'm not the only one thinking this
Russia? China?
can't help but think of Q140 😉 😉
@JoeLange
Can you see the PLAN?
Trump has been calling for the Senate to pass the SAVE Act. The Senate hasn’t done it yet. Why? I’ve been saying that there is a very good reason.
Thune has taken a beating from MAGA but he’s doing Trump’s bidding. That’s why Trump is gracious whenever he talks about Thune, unlike when he talks about real backstabbers like Massie and MTG.
Why was it important to “delay” passage of the SAVE Act?
Use logic.
Wouldn’t it be much better timing to wait till AFTER you expose that several democrat senators are illegitimately elected, so you can remove them first?
Not just Fulton county. That’s just the beginning. How about Arizona? Michigan? As Q said.
ENJOY THE SHOW! Everything is about to change. https://x.com/JoeLange/status/2076837315830595794