For Everyone That Keeps Asking if an Election Has Ever Been Overturned Due To Fraud! YES, and as Recent as 1994! Eyes on Pennsylvania!
(www.baltimoresun.com)
? B O O M ! ?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (31)
sorted by:
Simply, fraud vitiates everything.
I agree. Once you admit that you stole an election through multiple means, and admit you illegally certified electors, wouldn't that be enough to get things rolling?
I see this stated often, but I get the impression that the people repeating it don't understand what it means.
It doesn't mean that fraud undoes everything. It means that fraud spoils everything. Meaning that confirmation of fraud would make Biden the President that cheated to get elected... But he would still be President.
Nope. Read the SCoTUS ruling again.
Nope. I have a solid grasp of the opinion. It is like I said. Fraud does not undo anything; it spoils it. The opinion states explicitly that the point isn't to go back and undo all of the fraud; just that because fraud was present, relief may be granted.
United States v. Throckmorton, 98 US 61 - Supreme Court 1878
It may be hard to comprehend because of the language used. So to summarize what that means: The court may set aside it's own judgements and grant relief (i.e. a redo or new trial) if fraud was used to obtain the judgement, but the court will not attempt to adjudicate the actual fraud.
So, what was the "certification" of the Congress of the Electoral College if not a "decree" of a court (of sorts)?
And, the Congress is not adjudicating the fraudulent actions that occurred against American voters by fraudulent interference in the determination of the tallies. The Congress would simply be recognizing that fraud vitiates their decree that Biden won the Electoral votes.
Might I add under FRAUDULENT DURESS.