11
mastaxn 11 points ago +11 / -0

So on this, they're just being petty by using that as justification. They're not acknowledging that he is serving his second term, but rather saying that since Trump claims he won in 2020 then he should be ineligible by his own statements...

Like an angry child shoving everything on the floor into his closet then arguing with his parents that they didn't say he had to put everything where it belongs; so his room is clean.

4
mastaxn 4 points ago +4 / -0

Nothing new under the Sun. They protect their own... Or rather, Republicans protect their own (fellow Congressman), while Democrats use every opportunity to dwindle Republican numbers... But it's cool because Republicans claim the moral high ground and can state with humility that they're above militant politics... smh

23
mastaxn 23 points ago +23 / -0

I'm not getting my hopes up. Judges seem all too eager to dismiss or otherwise hinder these election cases.

1
mastaxn 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was referring to the woman in the black shirt who made this video.

3
mastaxn 3 points ago +4 / -1

Well, yeah, this is great and all... Just this video seems... Petty. Maybe it's just her tone and demeanor, idk.

3
mastaxn 3 points ago +3 / -0

Busch Gardens in Tampa Bay is an absolute dump. We got free tickets and took the kids and I kept telling my wife how much I loved the place as a kid 25 years ago... Man how age changed my perspective.

There was trash everywhere. Facilities were in disrepair and dirty. The staff gave off a vibe of resentment to guests.

If anyone is still going to that place, and enjoying it, I'd be surprised.

2
mastaxn 2 points ago +5 / -3

Oh, no. Not this shit again. It's the inflatable military jet all over again.

Grainy, undersaturated cctv video with obvious color bleeding and compression artifacts compared to a product photo... Stop with this garbage, already.

Or at the very least take the product photo, shrink it, blur it, desaturate it, then compare it to the cctv video.

8
mastaxn 8 points ago +8 / -0

October 21, 2015.

Marty jumps 30 years back (1985 -> 1955), 30 years ahead (1985 -> 2015), then 100 years back (1985 -> 1885) in the third movie.

edit: Doc Brown says at one point "I'll travel, say, 30 years or so. Nice round number."

Sorry, this is one of my favorite movie franchises. Can't let this fake news stand!

1
mastaxn 1 point ago +1 / -0

When you get injured that badly, you definitely want a tetanus shot. You do not want to get tetanus. Your whole body will be in severe pain and you will barely be able to move. It can kill you; fatal in 11% of cases.

2
mastaxn 2 points ago +2 / -0

How much of this data is still preserved at this point? I find it an odd coincidence that only after two years these cases are starting to gain traction. Almost as if it's already known that the evidence has been destroyed.

10
mastaxn 10 points ago +10 / -0

No judge is going to rule against the Democratic machine on election fraud. They are either die-hard loyalists, or too afraid of the consequences.

1
mastaxn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, the judge basically said that they needed to file a complaint about the procedures when they were known about, before the election, rather than after they were used. But we all know that they would have been dismissed on standing or no harm or some nonsense if they had.

4
mastaxn 4 points ago +6 / -2

Yeah. I got that and all. But most of the counts were dismissed. They are only hearing the printer tampering charge and the chain of custody one. I think the signature verification count had a lot more chance for success. The counts being tried are an uphill battle to say the least.

2
mastaxn 2 points ago +6 / -4

Actually, at least one of the complaints (signature verification process) was tossed on laches.

1
mastaxn 1 point ago +2 / -1

Oh, don't worry. The media will be telling us he deported more illegal aliens than Trump... Count on it.

2
mastaxn 2 points ago +2 / -0

They announced that they were going to do tests to determine biology and where to place him. Then we heard nothing about it ever again.

My guess is that the Biden admin scrambled to conceal that Griner is a man and they negotiated a shitty prisoner trade with the condition that they drop any mention of it.

2
mastaxn 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because they know they will lose and it then becomes constitutional precedent... Which means they would have a tougher fight in the future.

This is basically a feigned retreat. They'll try again another time with another policy based on another regulation.

9
mastaxn 9 points ago +9 / -0

My take on this is that he had an itch that he couldn't quite scratch and crossed the line to satisfy his sexual urges... That being, that his whole "identity" is nothing more than that he gets off on dressing in women's clothing and being thought about in a sexual way while dressed as such.

He stole the clothes because he was getting off on wearing a woman's previously worn and unwashed clothing... It's his kink. I bet he has girls wear all his clothes before he uses them unwashed...

Lol. The guy has been using the White House publicity as a way to get himself off... And libs are too stupid to recognize it for what it is. Hilarious!

1
mastaxn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Feels like 2020 all over again. Who's ready to go around to friends and family telling them shits 'bout to go down only to look like a complete fool in a few weeks when nothing happens?

view more: Next ›