I think viruses exist, but they are inert clump of matter that does not do what the scientists say they do - spread diseases.
Lanka's thesis is very convincing, and so is the fact that Louis Pasteur's last words were "Germs are nothing." (Again, bacteria exists, but they clean up waste in the body rather than cause diseases)
So my real question (and I digress here) is this. We also fully know that Fauci and Dr Shi and the folks in UNC and that EcoHealth dude - they were all earnestly creating a deadly virus.
So I can think of these possibilities:
They were never trying to create a virus, and this whole FOIA email story is a hoax.
They knew viruses dont cause disease but still tried to create it, so they can perpetuate the pandemic hoax
They earnestly believe the germ theory and hence they were trying to create the virus.
It's really none of the 4 on your list. I believe the "gain of function" research is their cover story for enabling them to hold patents on all future treatments of their "designer viruses". Their shutdown of HCQ and Ivermectin, etc. supports this thesis IMHO.
You know the story is a lie because the MSM is openly covering it. Anything to continue to perpetuate the ongoing fearful IDEA that there's a "deadly virus" going around is good enough for them.
Nonetheless, they have to actually "do stuff" to pretend this is what they're up to however. In fairness to the virologists/workers in these labs, they believe the "viral isolation" methodology, which is the fundamental sleight-of-hand of virology, thus believe they're actually dealing with something "real".
As such, I'm quite sure the virologists are "true believers". Have a listen to Judy Mikovits some time, if you can tolerate her incessant yammering. She's been fully informed by Cowan and Kaufman, even sitting on the same webinar panels with them both. She never offers up a single argument against their stance on germ theory, but instead rambles on about how real her research was with viruses. That's all the evidence I need to understand how deeply brainwashed people can become. She never even stops to consider that perhaps, just perhaps, viruses don't exist. Case closed right there.
If you saw Lanka's most recent experiment results, he stepped through the "viral isolation" process exactly as the virologists do, skipping the only step that should be vital, which was adding the fluid/blood/snot/tissue of the "infected" person - which would be the actual "introduction of the virus" to their "viral isolate cocktail" of course.
The results were identical to their experiments which "added the fluid/blood/snot/tissue", resulting in the small, irregular "particles" they call "viruses" - perfectly identical results in every way.
The "inert clump of matter" you believe in is just dead monkey kidney cells that were stressed, starved and poisoned as part of the establishment "viral isolation" methodology. Pure bunk from beginning to end.
"Viruses" never graduated from pure ASSUMPTION, which is all they ever were back when Pasteur got his Nobel prize for "rabies". It didn't exist then, and of course doesn't exist now. Pasteur's experiments were beyond a joke and his "proofs" utterly non-existent.
Read Ethel Hume's book, "Bechamp or Pasteur" to see how highly regarded Pasteur and his constant failures and missteps were for confirmation. Pasteur literally never got a single thing right his entire career. A perfect candidate to "prop up" by our global handlers, wouldn't you say?
Germ theory is a hoax but I've come to realize that almost nobody is willing to even contemplate or research it, let along accept it. There's some sort of unbreakable mind-control around the subject. The only two people I've been able to fully win over however, are an ER doctor and a registered nurse.
I've spent over a year answering questions and researching. What about the flu? What about colds? What about chicken pox? What about rabies? What about tuberculosis? What about small pox? What about polio? What about leprosy? What about Cooties-1984?
Took a deep dive on all of these, and many more. There's a perfectly sane and logical explanation for them all. Not a one is or ever has been explained by "contagion" or "infection". It's truly astonishing once you dive in. Every experiment for viruses relies on the faux "isolation" methodology and the lion's share of bacterial dis-eases rely on INJECTING the bacteria into the various animals and then shockingly, actually later FINDING the bacteria present. Astonishing, eh?
The bacterial explanation is actually a lot more fun but I won't dive in here. Check out Bechamp's "Microzymas" or Naesan's "Somatids" (exact same thing) for a clear understanding of the basis of all life, and the many "forms" of "bacteria" that they morph into in order to assist with the creation of, or breakdown of tissue. Fascinating stuff, and of course, totally suppressed in mainstream medical education.
I think viruses exist, but they are inert clump of matter that does not do what the scientists say they do - spread diseases.
Lanka's thesis is very convincing, and so is the fact that Louis Pasteur's last words were "Germs are nothing." (Again, bacteria exists, but they clean up waste in the body rather than cause diseases)
So my real question (and I digress here) is this. We also fully know that Fauci and Dr Shi and the folks in UNC and that EcoHealth dude - they were all earnestly creating a deadly virus.
So I can think of these possibilities:
They were never trying to create a virus, and this whole FOIA email story is a hoax.
They knew viruses dont cause disease but still tried to create it, so they can perpetuate the pandemic hoax
They earnestly believe the germ theory and hence they were trying to create the virus.
Another explanation ?
What do you think ?
It's really none of the 4 on your list. I believe the "gain of function" research is their cover story for enabling them to hold patents on all future treatments of their "designer viruses". Their shutdown of HCQ and Ivermectin, etc. supports this thesis IMHO.
You know the story is a lie because the MSM is openly covering it. Anything to continue to perpetuate the ongoing fearful IDEA that there's a "deadly virus" going around is good enough for them.
Nonetheless, they have to actually "do stuff" to pretend this is what they're up to however. In fairness to the virologists/workers in these labs, they believe the "viral isolation" methodology, which is the fundamental sleight-of-hand of virology, thus believe they're actually dealing with something "real".
As such, I'm quite sure the virologists are "true believers". Have a listen to Judy Mikovits some time, if you can tolerate her incessant yammering. She's been fully informed by Cowan and Kaufman, even sitting on the same webinar panels with them both. She never offers up a single argument against their stance on germ theory, but instead rambles on about how real her research was with viruses. That's all the evidence I need to understand how deeply brainwashed people can become. She never even stops to consider that perhaps, just perhaps, viruses don't exist. Case closed right there.
If you saw Lanka's most recent experiment results, he stepped through the "viral isolation" process exactly as the virologists do, skipping the only step that should be vital, which was adding the fluid/blood/snot/tissue of the "infected" person - which would be the actual "introduction of the virus" to their "viral isolate cocktail" of course.
The results were identical to their experiments which "added the fluid/blood/snot/tissue", resulting in the small, irregular "particles" they call "viruses" - perfectly identical results in every way.
The "inert clump of matter" you believe in is just dead monkey kidney cells that were stressed, starved and poisoned as part of the establishment "viral isolation" methodology. Pure bunk from beginning to end.
"Viruses" never graduated from pure ASSUMPTION, which is all they ever were back when Pasteur got his Nobel prize for "rabies". It didn't exist then, and of course doesn't exist now. Pasteur's experiments were beyond a joke and his "proofs" utterly non-existent.
Read Ethel Hume's book, "Bechamp or Pasteur" to see how highly regarded Pasteur and his constant failures and missteps were for confirmation. Pasteur literally never got a single thing right his entire career. A perfect candidate to "prop up" by our global handlers, wouldn't you say?
Germ theory is a hoax but I've come to realize that almost nobody is willing to even contemplate or research it, let along accept it. There's some sort of unbreakable mind-control around the subject. The only two people I've been able to fully win over however, are an ER doctor and a registered nurse.
I've spent over a year answering questions and researching. What about the flu? What about colds? What about chicken pox? What about rabies? What about tuberculosis? What about small pox? What about polio? What about leprosy? What about Cooties-1984?
Took a deep dive on all of these, and many more. There's a perfectly sane and logical explanation for them all. Not a one is or ever has been explained by "contagion" or "infection". It's truly astonishing once you dive in. Every experiment for viruses relies on the faux "isolation" methodology and the lion's share of bacterial dis-eases rely on INJECTING the bacteria into the various animals and then shockingly, actually later FINDING the bacteria present. Astonishing, eh?
The bacterial explanation is actually a lot more fun but I won't dive in here. Check out Bechamp's "Microzymas" or Naesan's "Somatids" (exact same thing) for a clear understanding of the basis of all life, and the many "forms" of "bacteria" that they morph into in order to assist with the creation of, or breakdown of tissue. Fascinating stuff, and of course, totally suppressed in mainstream medical education.