Rule one is the wickest. First it addresses at some ruler or government to "maintain" humanity under 500 millions. So not the individual but somebody else will decide and reduce population by 95%.
That is clearly a humanocide.
The other rules we can discuss, but this one is evil.
This. And #2 implies that some group or ruler will be in charge of guiding reproduction. The way I read that, only the most worthy will be allowed to have children.
None of them are rules. They are not called rule stones, they are guidelines which are suggestions. It does not ask any ruler of humanity to do any such thing. First of all they suggest that every nation is sovereign which is not globalist and directly implies no rule r of humanity.When you cross reference to #2 you see how population is maintained by individuals being responsible.
Rule one is the wickest. First it addresses at some ruler or government to "maintain" humanity under 500 millions. So not the individual but somebody else will decide and reduce population by 95%. That is clearly a humanocide. The other rules we can discuss, but this one is evil.
This. And #2 implies that some group or ruler will be in charge of guiding reproduction. The way I read that, only the most worthy will be allowed to have children.
None of them are rules. They are not called rule stones, they are guidelines which are suggestions. It does not ask any ruler of humanity to do any such thing. First of all they suggest that every nation is sovereign which is not globalist and directly implies no rule r of humanity.When you cross reference to #2 you see how population is maintained by individuals being responsible.
But you have to admit, it doesn't say where to maintain it. Maybe it refers only to the U.S., in which case we still have some growing to do.