The BMJ is a weekly peer-reviewed medical trade journal, published by the trade union the British Medical Association (BMA). The BMJ has editorial freedom from the BMA.[1] It is one of the world's oldest general medical journals. Originally called the British Medical Journal, the title was officially shortened to BMJ in 1988, and then changed to The BMJ in 2014.[2] The journal is published by BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, a subsidiary of the British Medical Association (BMA). The editor-in-chief of The BMJ is Fiona Godlee, who was appointed in February 2005.[3]
You already lost your credibility. I don't care what you think.
Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine published the fake paper without peer review.
Obviously they are under the thumb of the enemy and are no longer serving the interests of the people. The 'medical community' must be struggling right now. So many doctors must be questioning the NIH, CDC, and the WHO. These are not stupid people. Pressure is going to rise I think.
Well that's great, honestly I don't care what you think either.
They published without peer review because they were told too. And just like what will happen when the story breaks on how much Hydroxychloriquine can help in the early stages, some will be proven to be dishonest yet again regardless of how intelligent they are!
Gaslighting. There is no value to peer review if what they are reviewing is hypothetical. Seems to me you're attempting to legitimise this dodgy research.
The research paper is not based on data but on statistical modelling. Also not peer-reviewed.
Peer review of statistical modelling is irrelevant.
Here's a suggestion. How about you check your facts before you comment?
https://gh.bmj.com/content/5/9/e003094
The BMJ is a weekly peer-reviewed medical trade journal, published by the trade union the British Medical Association (BMA). The BMJ has editorial freedom from the BMA.[1] It is one of the world's oldest general medical journals. Originally called the British Medical Journal, the title was officially shortened to BMJ in 1988, and then changed to The BMJ in 2014.[2] The journal is published by BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, a subsidiary of the British Medical Association (BMA). The editor-in-chief of The BMJ is Fiona Godlee, who was appointed in February 2005.[3]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_BMJ
And the Lancet published a knowingly false report! The point being if you cannot rely on what were once impeccable journals then we are just guessing.
You already lost your credibility. I don't care what you think.
Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine published the fake paper without peer review.
Obviously they are under the thumb of the enemy and are no longer serving the interests of the people. The 'medical community' must be struggling right now. So many doctors must be questioning the NIH, CDC, and the WHO. These are not stupid people. Pressure is going to rise I think.
Well that's great, honestly I don't care what you think either.
They published without peer review because they were told too. And just like what will happen when the story breaks on how much Hydroxychloriquine can help in the early stages, some will be proven to be dishonest yet again regardless of how intelligent they are!
Gaslighting. There is no value to peer review if what they are reviewing is hypothetical. Seems to me you're attempting to legitimise this dodgy research.
Worthless comment not going to spend any time on replying other than this.