[32] Chat Line Compilation for "10:25PM EST: GEORGE NEWS FATHERS DAY LATE CHAT, 06/20/2021 #GEORGEnews"
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (18)
sorted by:
If I've stuck with GN for this long, then I'd have at least noticed the well-meaning but incomplete comments against trusting GN. By God I know the allegations and I've argued time and time again how those allegations are flawed, and how I consider GN reliable.
All you're doing is saying, "Trust me guys, these guys are not legit." Give me specific details and I will address those after I come back from work tomorrow.
In the meantime, I will leave you with this brief exchange:
https://greatawakening.win/p/12i4DNG9JY/x/c/4DzeCotCcJr?d=50
Addendum: Here's also an investigation I did into the origins of GN on February 7, 2021 before the drama unfolded:
GEORGE and GEORGEnews: An investigation into its origins
https://greatawakening.win/p/12hR7dbWCc/george-and-georgenews-an-investi/
And here's a long post that I wrote in the midst of the drama on March 12, 2021:
If I'm going to keep posting George News, I'd better demonstrate some reasoning for why I'm confident that they're legit, and explain my stance on the matter. Here's this through a comment dialogue, and some thoughts about the drama. (Long post)
https://greatawakening.win/p/12hkmZiBHO/if-im-going-to-keep-posting-geor/
Note because of how much information has arisen since, some of my arguments may be incomplete.
As I said, continue is you wish, but trust is a rare commodity these days, and these guys knowingly pushed misrepresented info. They were caught out, thus why I don't have trust in them. I'm done with media hacks pushing false info for clout, no matter what side of the aisle they stand on.
Again, you don't have to like it, but lie to me and you are a liar, this includes GeorgeNews.
Despite what you were led to believe, I have complete faith in them. They have my trust because they have shown me enough evidence that they are who they say they are, across my compilations; in my corroboration of time-limited releases like the email screenshots; in the testimony of individuals like BardsFM and Liz Crokin; in the consistency of their content; in the impossibility of maintaining an illusion over 54 Chat Lines; in the consistently positive language that they use; and where it is impossible to confirm any concrete information, in logical reasoning.
I do not agree that they knowingly pushed misrepresented info, although you have not specified what that info is. I do not agree that they were "caught out", although you have not stated for what specifically. I do not believe they are liars and I do not believe that they have lied to you, although you have also not specified how.
If you do not wish to consider exploring how George could actually be legit and hence participate in whatever you might have found interesting in the Chat Line, and are satisfied with where we stand, then please leave and, in future, please do not enter my posts for the sole purpose of smearing my topic.
Exactly this.^^ Reasoned discussion—great, let’s have it, frens. That’s why all of us are here. But the blanket-statement, unsubstantiated smears are getting pretty tired by this point. Those of us who have followed GN closely from the beginning have seen enough to be convinced in spite of the legitimate questions that were raised in March.