-
The Report from the Arizona election audit.
-
What Chinese defector Dong reveals.
-
The data dump from John McAfee's deadman's switch.
It's possible nothing comes from any of these, or each could be Atomic Bomb level and reinforce one another. I think we'll know by tge end of the summer.
You don't do anything "covertly" with ballistic missile submarines; construction is very publicly observable. The USS Richard B. Russell was an attack submarine, not a ballistic missile submarine. It was decommissioned and stricken in 1994.
And it was not a Standard missile that was launched "at AF1" off Whidbey Island. AF1 was nowhere near that location. This fanciful stuff isn't helping.
Guess you missed the rather extensive attention Q paid to this, as well as the work the anons did on it. Q spelled this one out. Are you aware of the presence of the Doomsday plane near Whidbey?
No. And neither are you. There was no Doomsday plane near Whidbey Island. There might have been a special flight of F-15s from McChord Air Force Base to intercept whatever might have been launched while it was still boosting. Q made reference to a "special package." My analysis of the missile trajectory only got so far as to identify the azimuth of the path as being northwards, not toward wherever Air Force One was supposed to be. The most likely scenario was to constitute a false flag single missile attack on Russia.
Okay, so you weren't around in those days and you did NOT see what the anons dug up. Got it. ~
I recall there was a lot of supposition that the purported missile was an attempt to intercept Air Force One...which was actually in the western Pacific Ocean at the time. There is a commonplace public confusion between the Air Force One 747 and the E-4 airplane.
Would you like to elucidate? With the exception of Trident submarines, there are no more strategic weapons present in Washington state. Nuclear command and control is more typically rendered for submarines by E-6 aircraft.