If Ron DeSantis signed this, my hopes for him have died. Comments inside.
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (73)
sorted by:
This popping back up every day from a different user each acting like they just discovered it does not make it feel any less shilly.
The shills are very persistent with this crap. DeSantis terrifies them, so they do what little they can to try to discredit him.
It's not working...
Thankfully I can block annoying shills like this.
I read somewhere that the text you reference died in committee and was not in the version signed by the governor. Looking for sauce....
Bye. You are annoying.
From WhatsHerFace on Telegram:
"So, there is a portion that says businesses and schools aren't allowed to ask for proof of vaccination and if someone declines the vax they must isolate or quarantine yadayada, then it goes into the section that if the State considers the person a threat, they can be forced to be vaccinate or be treated by any means necessary. And of course it uses subjective language like "significant morbidity" and "severe danger" with no quantifiable limitationn Catch 22 haha jeeeez. People thought they were saved."
DeSantis has strong enough credibility from ignoring federal mandates during the pandemic that it will take much more than this for me to doubt his intentions
Even Texas didn't get as bold as DeSantis
No, but we're getting more and more sure with every post you make.
Seriously? A clip from a doc that came from where? How do you even know this is a bill coming out of the state of Florida? Again, I say, seriously?
Thank for posting sauce...
We would need to see the final law that DeSantis signed. This looks like a word document with “track changes”
Your almost there! Keep digging there is more to this story!
(Like try to find out when this was first introduced in Florida, hint: 2002)
So there are what 4-5 of you glowbohomos that come here and repeat the same drivel. Make a new account every few days, or even activate some sort of sleeper account you guys have been sitting on.
You have no power here!
There is not way THIS document was signed into law with track changes in it. I can't even publish pamphlets at my job with track changes.
Second, one kinda has to see them whole law and not isolate one portion as the over all architecture of the law may temper how differing sections are applied.
" 381.00316 COVID-19 vaccine documentation.— 1122 (1) A business entity, as defined in s. 768.38 to include 1123 any business operating in this state, may not require patrons or 1124 customers to provide any documentation certifying COVID-19 1125 vaccination or post-infection recovery to gain access to, entry 1126 upon, or service from the business operations in this state. 1127 This subsection does not otherwise restrict businesses from 1128 instituting screening protocols consistent with authoritative or 1129 controlling government-issued guidance to protect public health. 1130 (2) A governmental entity as defined in s. 768.38 may not 1131 require persons to provide any documentation certifying COVID-19 1132 vaccination or post-infection recovery to gain access to, entry 1133 upon, or service from the governmental entity’s operations in 1134 this state. This subsection does not otherwise restrict 1135 governmental entities from instituting screening protocols 1136 consistent with authoritative or controlling government-issued 1137 guidance to protect public health. 1138 (3) An educational institution as defined in s. 768.38 may 1139 not require students or residents to provide any documentation 1140 certifying COVID-19 vaccination or post-infection recovery for 1141 attendance or enrollment, or to gain access to, entry upon, or 1142 service from such educational institution in this state. This 1143 subsection does not otherwise restrict educational institutions 1144 from instituting screening protocols consistent with 1145 authoritative or controlling government-issued guidance to 1146 protect public health. 1147 (4) The department may impose a fine not to exceed $5,000 1148 per violation. 1149 (5) This section does not apply to a health care provider 1150 as defined in s. 768.38; a service provider licensed or 1151 certified under s. 393.17, part III of chapter 401, or part IV 1152 of chapter 468; or a provider with an active health care clinic 1153 exemption under s. 400.9935. 1154 (6) The department may adopt rules pursuant to ss. 120.536 1155 and 120.54 to implement this section."
"significant morbidity or mortality," what does that even mean? What is considered significant? .01%? .1%? 1%? No standard given, open to interpretation? If something like the pluege were to run through and kill 1/3 as it did, would it justify the Draconian measures we have seen over this last 15-16 months?
They can already do this for TB.
"john-durham" confirmed.
Almost the same damn, hysterical, lashing out responses