Has anyone asked Gen Flynn, Mike Lindell, Lin Wood, etc., why Trump is saying the vaccines are safe when 99% of the Q community thinks it's poison?
Another repost about 5D chess
I would like to see some discussion on this. I can't stop thinking about this discrepancy. It makes no sense to me. Has anyone asked the people we think are closely related to Q why President Trump is saying that the vaccines are safe when we have plenty of data to show otherwise?
When it's proved that there are treatments, then the vax won't even be legal in the US because it's only allowed for emergency use because there aren't other treatments.
Soon, when it's accepted that the other treatments work, the vaxes will all be permanently withdrawn and the cabal plan ruined. No chance for more versions of the vax or booster schedules.
When it is shown that the cabal people like Fauci suppressed the treatments in order to coerce lockdowns and experimental vaxes, then they are all going to gitmo or the Hague for treason and human rights violations.
When the people realize what the cabal tried to do, then their power will all be gone and they won't be able to walk the streets.
Game set match.
^^^This
I think Trump could have stopped the roll-out of this vax if he had really pushed for alternatives like HCQ. After Fauci claimed it was a killer, POTUS could have simply waved his 2005 paper on the effectiveness of HCQ against SARS-1 and tied the dwarf into even smaller knots. Trump also could have distributed HCQ and Zinc and Ivermectin across the country like they did in India to counter the evil governors and demonstrate its effectiveness. But he didn't.
The media would have fought him for sure, but he would have won, and the EUA would never have been obtained. This time. But would Trump have been able to stop the roll-out of the next, and more dangerous mRNA vax? Maybe, maybe not. Better to show the cabal for what it is now, before it can perfect its weapons.
I also don't think the main purpose of the vax is depopulation. Sure some will die, others will get profoundly sick, and others become infertile. Most will live, albeit some will suffer long-term effects and become permanent customers of the medical-health complex. Win-win for the cabal.
I think the main thrust becomes control by adding 5G into the equation. The birth of SARS-Cov-2 in Wuhan, the pilot city for China's 5G whose citizens had just undergone a mandatory vaccine is just too coincidental to ignore. Once vaxxed, 5G at the right frequency can somehow make your body more susceptible to death (through say, electroporation).
Now, the constant threat of targeted death (5G is short range and directional) keeps you under control. Especially since you have already demonstrated your willingness to obey by undergoing vaccination.
This is not ideal, but gives me hope that we are not going to witness a mass die-off
I didn't answer this great high effort comment straight away because I really don't know what to say.
I'm also very highly suspicious of the 5G towers which have sprouted up all over my city.
I believe 5G phased array antennae for directing beams towards your device for good reception. What else can the beam forming be used for?
5G doesnt't seem to have the market demand to justify its rapid rollout.
Although i have a good technical background, I really can't evaluate all the great reset possibilities for 5G yet.
At the very least, 5G and the internet of things makes surveillance very much easier.
Oh yeah, surveillance is likely a huge reason for IoTs. Of course I'm sold the notion that I need it so my milk gets delivered before I run out. That, and other life threatening scenarios in my day-to-day life.
Control of humans through 5G coupled with the vaxx, rather than depopulation through the vaxx fits the observation that the DS is pushing the vaxx on its obedient sheep -- it's not to kill them, it's to ensure they stay obedient.
Totally ?
NCSWC