? 82% of pregnant women who took mRNA vaccine had miscarriage ?
(www.lifesitenews.com)
?️ STAT DEBATABLE LOL ?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (148)
sorted by:
Mods please sticky, I could not believe that the % was that high, but reading the article and the details it is the truth. YES, YOU READ THAT RIGHT 82% MISCARRIAGES.
Summary of how they get 82%: 827 total women who are pregnant are in the study. 700 of them had the vaccine in the 3rd trimester. 127 of them had the vaccine within the first 20 weeks of pregnancy (first trimester). Of the 127 woman who were pregnant and had the vaccine in the first trimester, 104 of the 127 pregnancies were lost.
Here is the gofile link of the table: https://gofile.io/d/KxDWCr
Or, like a functional fucking adult, you can link to the actual study (https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed) which is publicly available and free to read, and realize the author is fake and gay and that the unnamed oncologist is a figment of her imagination.
No, it are not 827 total women who are pregnant in the study. It are 3958 women, who are pregnant in the study. 827 is the number of women who had ended their pregnancy in the sample time window of the study (Vaccinated between february 28 and march 30), natural or otherwise.
so it is actually 104 of 1224 pregnancies. Research is hard.
sorry, very obvious shill you are, read carefully:
"Spontaneous abortion is the loss of pregnancy naturally before twenty weeks of gestation. Colloquially, spontaneous abortion is referred to as a 'miscarriage' to avoid association with induced abortion."
Important part of table 4: "†Data on pregnancy loss are based on 827 participants in the v-safe pregnancy registry who received an mRNA Covid-19 vaccine (BNT162b2 [Pfizer–BioNTech] or mRNA-1273 [Moderna]) from December 14, 2020, to February 28, 2021, and who reported a completed pregnancy. A total of 700 participants (84.6%) received their first eligible dose in the third trimester."
And so when you link the definition of spontaneous abortion with the data, that means the 700 pregnant women who received their first eligible dose in the third trimester, it is impossible for them to have a spontaneous abortion, because this only occurs within the first 20 weeks of pregnancy.
So then we have 127 eligible women left who have the possibility to have a spontaneous abortion, and 104 of those 127 women had spontaneous abortions. Unless they labeled terms incorrectly, that does look like 104 out of 127 eligible pregnant women in their first trimester experienced spontaneous abortion or "miscarriage". The other 700 women can't even have a spontaneous abortion, and the author of the article rightfully says they might as well have been 700 men.
Again. this is what happens when you read a single fucking graph instead of the entire article. The sample size is 3987. all of them were vaccinated, as it was one of the 2 selection criteria. Out of these 3987, 827 saw their pregnancy end within the window of observation. Out of these 827, 700 belonged to the third trimester group (Which took up 1019 of the initial sample), and the rest belonged to the second and first trimester group (These being 1714 and 1224 respectively). So, 70% of the people in the third trimester saw their pregnancy end, while only .46% of the second semester group and 7.8% of the first trimester. So the number is 8.2%.
Don't ask me where the remaining 23 of the 127 went to, because I have no idea. I can only presume they either got a normal abortion, or were at the very end of the second trimester and gave birth towards the end of the observation window.
so I am reading your take, is the amount of miscarries in the 3rd trimester not alarming to you? I see a lot of energy focussed on proving another anon wrong, but what is your take on the study?