I stumbled across this article from December 11, 2006:
https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna16153112
Report: U.S. bugged Princess Diana’s phone
The Central Intelligence Agency was bugging the telephone conversations of Britain's Princess Diana on the night she died, a British newspaper reported.
For as much as I've delved into this subject, I have never heard this before. Wow.
Mmm, interdasting, I hadn't stumbled across that either.
I also didn't know that bit.
With all recent events I've no idea what on earth is going on again... Kek.
I'd heard the theory about Henri Paul being drunk, but that doesn't hold water, as far as I'm concerned. He did have something to drink (but what was it and how much?), based on the cameras that were at the Ritz, but he seemed to be behaving normally and walking normally from what I could tell. It's hard to imagine that any of them would have gotten into the car if they suspected Paul to be that drunk. Besides, look at who he was working for. Dodi's family could afford anyone in the world for a driver. Paul would almost certainly have been trustworthy or he would have been sacked long before this incident.
You would think that Diana's bodyguard would have been alert for something like a drunk driver, but now Trevor Rees-Jones is suspect, given that he now works for AstraZeneca. He, coincidentally, was the only one in the car wearing a seatbelt. How convenient!
It was also reported that Diana never went anywhere without using her seatbelt, and yet, she wasn't wearing one that night and neither was Dodi.
Too many things had to come together to create this perfect storm. Too many things to have been sheer coincidence, methinks.
"With all recent events I've no idea what on earth is going on again..."
I hear you, fren. I just found out today that the Irish Potato Famine wasn't about potatoes. British soldiers confiscated all of the food supplies to starve out the Irish so that they could steal the good Irish timber needed to build boats for the Navy.
Although I know none of what we believe about history is true, there are still so many things that you don't think about until someone brings it up. It's like constantly getting slapped upside the head. At this point, my head is spinning. <googly eyes>
..." I just found out today that the Irish Potato Famine wasn't about potatoes. British soldiers confiscated all of the food supplies to starve out the Irish so that they could steal the good Irish timber needed to build boats for the Navy."... WOW....i did not know about that either...
Here's where you can read more about it:
https://greatawakening.win/p/12jJGb8KdW/-soupisim-ii--irish-deep-state-g/
Ty...
Let's not be forgetting that the 85 cameras (forgot the exact amount but it was 80 something) were apparently not working, where have we heard that before, and it took the ambulance 1hr 15min to travel the 3 odd miles to a hospital.
"...and it took the ambulance 1hr 15min to travel the 3 odd miles to a hospital."
They needed time to clear out the hospital so they could switch out Diana with the dead body double. <just kidding!>
So true. The potato post did exactly the same to me. Mind = Blown. We really have been run by murderous bastards for a very long time, they just got quieter and better at what they did. Now, with the internet (and recent overtness) they're pretty shafted.
You're right, there are so many things amiss with the Diana story, it's impossible to dig through all the smoke. It's like there are several factions that have an interest in people not knowing.
As regards Rees-Jones with AZ, I can make out what to think of them as a group either. I think they tried to go open source with the vax at first, then non-profit when Gates got involved (and probably threatened them). I haven't looked very far into them but I get the impression that like J & J they may be more maligned that others for less reason. Dunno, more thinking required..
The slapping of the head is oddly addictive, I know exactly what you mean with the revelations but I think oddly I feel a little better afterward that the world fits together a bit neater. So many gaps though, so much stuff to relearn, much head slapping to come.
I wonder if the Mercedes was hacked.
Well, something was up -- the car ran into the 13th pillar in the tunnel.
No coincidences there, right?
"the night she died" .. and probably years prior to that !
Well, they admitted they had over 1,000 pages of data on her....oh, but they weren't targeting her. I guess that makes it all ok.
There were rumors at the time that she was pregnant with Dodi's child. Imagine if you were the C_A and you wanted to stage a FF implicating Muslims on, say, Sept. 11, 2001. However, the most adored woman in the entire world was not only married to a Muslim, but had children by him. Hmmm....this could be a problem if your goal was to make the world hate Muslims and start a war with them. Better to take her out before any of this becomes a problem? Diana died 4 years before 9/11. When do you suppose the C_A started planning 9/11??
Back at Dodi's apartment, which is where they were headed, was an expensive ring that the two of them had picked out together. Dodi's father has always maintained that it was an engagement ring.
Here's a picture of the ring:
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/64/4a/6f/644a6f36227340b3f67b989cea93492a.jpg
You be the judge.
I've heard that theory many times, and it's as plausible as any other However given Harry of Wales current outbursts of insanity these last couple of years I wondered of there could be another explanation?
Prince Charles was extremely close to Jimmy Saville, so close in fact Saville could walk into the Palace alone and without scrutiny. Now like say P Andrew and Epstein, the Family would know all about Epstein especially after being convicted for sex with an underage girl. There is no way that he wouldn't know, even if he said he didn't know his staff would have informed him.
People knew all about Saville back in the 70's even. Now how plausible is it that Princess Di found out some pretty dark secrets about Charles and Saville type stuff, that would make her a target? As for Harry, could he have been told what and why his mother really died, along with and there's no denying it, Harry has a striking resemblance to Capt Hewitt. It's said that Di didn't have a relationship with Hewitt at the time of Harry's birth, but we only have speculation about this maybe the history between them went further back.
It would explain why Princess Di feared for her life before she lost it, and it may go some way to explain why Harry has turned on his entire family?
I remember reading at some point that Harry had considered doing a DNA test to see whether the Hewitt rumor could be true. Cooler heads pointed out that should it prove that he was NOT Charles' son, then he would lose all of his royal privileges.
In hindsight, it doesn't appear that this matters, as he's done a pretty good job of burning that bridge without the DNA test.
Given that Harry is such a loose cannon, I doubt anyone has clued him in to anything nefarious that might have happened to Diana. He would never keep something like that quiet.
I've also heard that Diana was killed on the orders of Prince Philip, unbeknownst to Queen Elizabeth. It's hard to imagine the Queen wouldn't have known, if this was true.
Who knows? And, who's to say there wasn't more than one group that wanted her dead? They might have been working together for the sake of plausible deniability. Of course, this is assuming she's really dead. I have a feeling there are a lot of "walking" dead in this world -- I'm just not sure whether Diana could be one of them.
I didn't know that Harry had considered a DNA test, maybe he did and found out that way which in turn made him burn his bridges with the rest of the family. Not forgetting Charles propped him up financially despite harry saying otherwise, a payoff maybe?
I don't know like lot's of us, but just like 9 11 and present day, I know something ain't right!