Actually, I wonder if they are trying to limit what evidence will be presented in court.
A clever lawyer might subpeona witnesses and ONLY ask them limited questions that serves the person asking the questions, but does not get into topics that do not help.
Then, if they can put those witnesses on their list of witnesses and the other side does NOT ALSO put them on THEIR list, then when it gets to trial, the side who pulled this maneauver (Dominion) can prevent the other side from any witness testimony that is outside the scope of what has already been established.
There are tricks of the rules of court.
You would think that Powell and Guiliani would be on to their tricks, but THEY are not the attorneys for the other side. It is up to those attorneys to do things right or to "take a dive for the other team."
Actually, I wonder if they are trying to limit what evidence will be presented in court.
A clever lawyer might subpeona witnesses and ONLY ask them limited questions that serves the person asking the questions, but does not get into topics that do not help.
Then, if they can put those witnesses on their list of witnesses and the other side does NOT ALSO put them on THEIR list, then when it gets to trial, the side who pulled this maneauver (Dominion) can prevent the other side from any witness testimony that is outside the scope of what has already been established.
There are tricks of the rules of court.
You would think that Powell and Guiliani would be on to their tricks, but THEY are not the attorneys for the other side. It is up to those attorneys to do things right or to "take a dive for the other team."
Run out the 22 month clock for ballot retention