There could be some truth in this. Remember when Andrew Weissman went after Arthur Andersen?
SCOTUS eventually found Andersen not guilty but in the mean time they had been charged and as such they could attract no more business because no-one wanted to hire an suditor under suspicion.
They went bust. Tens of thousands of jobs were lost. Weissman walked - another good day at the office.
If you think people are avoiding business with Trump you’re missing the huge number that would jump at the opportunity.
His name / brand has only expanded from his presidency. Internationally he is huge.
Likely the largest name in the world in the past 30 years.
I think the OP is suggesting that the banks may decide to pull the plug.
I know that we have had cases in the UK where builders have dipped into the red at certain times of the year and the banks have understood. Then, suddenly, they decide to call in the loans one time and a builder's business ends up being taken from him.
I just mentioned the Andersen's affair because it highlights how innocent people, even massive companies, can still suffer at the hands of evil (Democrat) attorneys.
There could be some truth in this. Remember when Andrew Weissman went after Arthur Andersen?
SCOTUS eventually found Andersen not guilty but in the mean time they had been charged and as such they could attract no more business because no-one wanted to hire an suditor under suspicion.
They went bust. Tens of thousands of jobs were lost. Weissman walked - another good day at the office.
If you think people are avoiding business with Trump you’re missing the huge number that would jump at the opportunity. His name / brand has only expanded from his presidency. Internationally he is huge. Likely the largest name in the world in the past 30 years.
I think the OP is suggesting that the banks may decide to pull the plug.
I know that we have had cases in the UK where builders have dipped into the red at certain times of the year and the banks have understood. Then, suddenly, they decide to call in the loans one time and a builder's business ends up being taken from him.
I just mentioned the Andersen's affair because it highlights how innocent people, even massive companies, can still suffer at the hands of evil (Democrat) attorneys.