I don't see the issue with believing in God creating an ever evolving world. We can see evolution in all human frontiers. If God created the evolutionary process encoded in life, then God clearly still created us.
Darwin was wrong about anything being up to chance though. Evolution aims at targets and builds (or creates) what is necessary to gap the bridge.
As far as I can tell, that's a big part of what it means to be in the image of God, the creator.
I don't see the issue with believing in God creating an ever evolving world. We can see evolution in all human frontiers. If God created the evolutionary process encoded in life, then God clearly still created us.
The biggest issue with evolution as a theory is that it has been mathematically debunked numerous times. The lil gang of evolutionists keep having to meet and discuss how to modify their pet theory because it keeps getting leakier. Whole thing has more holes than a fishing net once you start to research it. Was one of the key things that convinced me early on in school that most of what "SCIENCE" says is a tasty meat and bean burrito is nothing but a dog turd in a tortilla. Looks tasty alright, but go ahead a take a bite.
"I don't see the issue with believing in God creating an ever evolving world. We can see evolution in all human frontiers. If God created the evolutionary process encoded in life, then God clearly still created us."
Agreed. In the book of Genesis, you'll discover the chronology of life is plagiarized by Charles Darwin for his own 'fantasticalized' interpetion. Even Darwin's edicts are grossly misrepresented today. His observations were of environmental 'adaptations' that exist as part of species traits for survival. This is explained through 'optimal balance' for each species, which persists in each species for their immutable existence.
He was wracked by guilt and anxiety about publishing his theory as it dismissed God from science, he was a believer and knew that others would use this to advance atheism, Thomas Huxley and others.
He went on to say that the survival of the fittest was not the only thing in his theory of survival, there were other elements to this, but he didn't elaborate what they were.
Darwin noticed finches beaks were deferent and assumed it was macro evolution that is believing a rock produced a banana. Micro evolution is a cat & tiger are one in the same.
Also he was super racist. Pacifist though. He thought that the lighter your skin the more evolved you were, he said that blacks should all be shipped to Africa for us to let them evolve.
He also had no idea that proteins existed, that DNA existed, that RNA existed and in fact he believed that the smallest form of matter was mucus and mucus made up cells.
The fact that we can find out that something as ridiculously complicated as DNA is the blueprint for our bodies and believe that it happened by accident is just unbelievably ignorant, or willfully stupid.
The problem with Darwin's story is the lack of reference to the foundations from which he built his thesis. I can't find the book I have on the subject, but for sure, there were other contemporary scientists mulling over similar ideas. True "science", like technology, is comprised of a thousand small steps.
Hell, who knows? Maybe he just got the credit like Fauci (AIDS).
Did not know that - but not surprising. Manufactured lies to draw people away from their creator taught in schools as fact. These people are pure evil.
I don't see the issue with believing in God creating an ever evolving world. We can see evolution in all human frontiers. If God created the evolutionary process encoded in life, then God clearly still created us.
Darwin was wrong about anything being up to chance though. Evolution aims at targets and builds (or creates) what is necessary to gap the bridge.
As far as I can tell, that's a big part of what it means to be in the image of God, the creator.
Exactly
Darwin also thought blacks were lesser humans, being lower on the "evolutionary scale"
The biggest issue with evolution as a theory is that it has been mathematically debunked numerous times. The lil gang of evolutionists keep having to meet and discuss how to modify their pet theory because it keeps getting leakier. Whole thing has more holes than a fishing net once you start to research it. Was one of the key things that convinced me early on in school that most of what "SCIENCE" says is a tasty meat and bean burrito is nothing but a dog turd in a tortilla. Looks tasty alright, but go ahead a take a bite.
Agreed. In the book of Genesis, you'll discover the chronology of life is plagiarized by Charles Darwin for his own 'fantasticalized' interpetion. Even Darwin's edicts are grossly misrepresented today. His observations were of environmental 'adaptations' that exist as part of species traits for survival. This is explained through 'optimal balance' for each species, which persists in each species for their immutable existence.
Evolution is either false or God directed. How would eyes evolve if the organism had no way of knowing there is something to see?
He also, in his later years, began to question his own theory of evolution.
He was wracked by guilt and anxiety about publishing his theory as it dismissed God from science, he was a believer and knew that others would use this to advance atheism, Thomas Huxley and others.
He went on to say that the survival of the fittest was not the only thing in his theory of survival, there were other elements to this, but he didn't elaborate what they were.
Darwin noticed finches beaks were deferent and assumed it was macro evolution that is believing a rock produced a banana. Micro evolution is a cat & tiger are one in the same.
Sounds a little farfetched
Also he was super racist. Pacifist though. He thought that the lighter your skin the more evolved you were, he said that blacks should all be shipped to Africa for us to let them evolve.
Darwin also thought blacks were lesser humans, being lower on the "evolutionary scale"
He also had no idea that proteins existed, that DNA existed, that RNA existed and in fact he believed that the smallest form of matter was mucus and mucus made up cells.
The fact that we can find out that something as ridiculously complicated as DNA is the blueprint for our bodies and believe that it happened by accident is just unbelievably ignorant, or willfully stupid.
The problem with Darwin's story is the lack of reference to the foundations from which he built his thesis. I can't find the book I have on the subject, but for sure, there were other contemporary scientists mulling over similar ideas. True "science", like technology, is comprised of a thousand small steps.
Hell, who knows? Maybe he just got the credit like Fauci (AIDS).
Did not know that - but not surprising. Manufactured lies to draw people away from their creator taught in schools as fact. These people are pure evil.