Why not both? They are both very friendly with each other when they are around in the same place. Quite the opposite reaction to Trump.
As an outgoing VP vs being speaker of the house, I'd say Pelosi of the pair is more likely to have assets in and around the capitol. Also that she would unequivocally favor staff hostile (even murderously so) to all Trump supporters. Throw in antifa and BLM criminals aka the likes of John Sullivan rampaging around the capitol building with free run of the building entirely unmolested by security, and that too adds much credence to the dems probably in concert with fbi and capital police being the architects of the Jan 6th insurgency. And besides coverups of the killer, also providing disinfo, and hiding camera footage.
Wouldn't the time to betray Trump (that would have inflicted the most damage in a plausibly deniable fashion) be the debate? Pence destroyed Kamala. Why would they allow someone on their side to destroy them?
FBI lying because terrified of Pence's ability to seem neutral in a redo election. Why would Pence's security detail feel threatened? He wasn't even there, so why would they be there instead of protecting him? We already knew who the shooter was (Byrd). Why was the FBI so desperate for you to believe this? Why are they (and controlled opposition Tucker) so desperate lately to revive Obama era complaints about NSA whitehats doing spying for MI?
A child could destroy Kamala in a debate, lets be fair here. If Pence decided to lose it and played the part of a fool even more than her, Trump might have discarded Pence like the failure he would have seemed to be. And then he couldn't have played the part he did post-election with voting to accept the invalid results based on fraudulent state certifications of the EC votes.
As for the FBI lying, thats like being shocked that the sun rises each morning. Their desperation always comes off like the squeaks of a cornered rat, because thats what they are and people know it now.
The fact that the two prevailing theories (both based on the bracelet) argue that it is a member of PENCE's security team or PELOSI's security team...
Is this the infamous:
RED3: CLAS movement PELOSI or PENCE
?
Why not both? They are both very friendly with each other when they are around in the same place. Quite the opposite reaction to Trump.
As an outgoing VP vs being speaker of the house, I'd say Pelosi of the pair is more likely to have assets in and around the capitol. Also that she would unequivocally favor staff hostile (even murderously so) to all Trump supporters. Throw in antifa and BLM criminals aka the likes of John Sullivan rampaging around the capitol building with free run of the building entirely unmolested by security, and that too adds much credence to the dems probably in concert with fbi and capital police being the architects of the Jan 6th insurgency. And besides coverups of the killer, also providing disinfo, and hiding camera footage.
Wouldn't the time to betray Trump (that would have inflicted the most damage in a plausibly deniable fashion) be the debate? Pence destroyed Kamala. Why would they allow someone on their side to destroy them?
https://twitter.com/TaylerUSA/status/1411381968567160840?s=20 "This piece by Spectator [lying about Pence] is disinformation. I can assume someone is paying Cockburn to spread lies, because that’s exactly what he’s doing."
FBI lying because terrified of Pence's ability to seem neutral in a redo election. Why would Pence's security detail feel threatened? He wasn't even there, so why would they be there instead of protecting him? We already knew who the shooter was (Byrd). Why was the FBI so desperate for you to believe this? Why are they (and controlled opposition Tucker) so desperate lately to revive Obama era complaints about NSA whitehats doing spying for MI?
A child could destroy Kamala in a debate, lets be fair here. If Pence decided to lose it and played the part of a fool even more than her, Trump might have discarded Pence like the failure he would have seemed to be. And then he couldn't have played the part he did post-election with voting to accept the invalid results based on fraudulent state certifications of the EC votes.
As for the FBI lying, thats like being shocked that the sun rises each morning. Their desperation always comes off like the squeaks of a cornered rat, because thats what they are and people know it now.
He could have swapped out VPs at the last second of his term for the offense of losing a debate?
I wasn't asking why the FBI lies, I was asking why they're so scared of Pence and the NSA.
Pretty sure we’ve been sitting in RED 3 since they showed Pence carrying the football out of the Capitol during the second impeachment trial.
Hmmmmm. Yes indeed. Nice connect. I like it