I know it's a shitpost, but as far as I'm aware they haven't yet identified the initial virus in accordance to Koch's postulate? So how do they have variants, and typically any variants would take many evolutions and usually weaken as the do so.
Biden "But but look ice cream, can I sniff your hair"......................
Koch's postulates do not apply directly to viruses, especially the second one. A virus is not a "microorgainism" because it isn't really an organism (debatable but true within this scope). It can't ever be grown in isolation, because it requires another cell to grow it, thus a virus can never meet Koch's postulates.
That doesn't mean it is impossible to completely isolate viral bodies, but such a process is far beyond the scope of any reasonable study of a virus. That would be done only to prove it could be done (and for no other reason or purpose of study), which is the protest that all the "there is no such thing as a virus" fans pronounce.
As for the other postulates, there are thousands of papers that suggest otherwise, with many thousands of electron microscopy pictures, RNA sequencing, transmissibility studies, etc., etc., all stuff that biologists do every day in the lab, and that all of our knowledge of biology is based on.
I think the variants are all real. I think their supposed effects are, within scope, fraudulent. But of course they are, since ALL of the data is completely fraudulent.
Just because the whole thing is a scam, doesn't mean the virus isn't real, and that variants aren't real. Because of their replication rate, viruses mutate all the time. But actual gain of function, that means anything substantial, is pretty rare.
I have seen no evidence that any variant has any statistically meaningful impact whatsoever on the overall virulence or transmissibility of the original SARS-CoV-2 virus. If anything it is getting less virulent over time, but that's pretty much meaningless since if you aren't vitamin deficient its mostly harmless anyways.
I know it's a shitpost, but as far as I'm aware they haven't yet identified the initial virus in accordance to Koch's postulate? So how do they have variants, and typically any variants would take many evolutions and usually weaken as the do so.
Biden "But but look ice cream, can I sniff your hair"......................
Koch's postulates do not apply directly to viruses, especially the second one. A virus is not a "microorgainism" because it isn't really an organism (debatable but true within this scope). It can't ever be grown in isolation, because it requires another cell to grow it, thus a virus can never meet Koch's postulates.
That doesn't mean it is impossible to completely isolate viral bodies, but such a process is far beyond the scope of any reasonable study of a virus. That would be done only to prove it could be done (and for no other reason or purpose of study), which is the protest that all the "there is no such thing as a virus" fans pronounce.
As for the other postulates, there are thousands of papers that suggest otherwise, with many thousands of electron microscopy pictures, RNA sequencing, transmissibility studies, etc., etc., all stuff that biologists do every day in the lab, and that all of our knowledge of biology is based on.
I think the variants are all real. I think their supposed effects are, within scope, fraudulent. But of course they are, since ALL of the data is completely fraudulent.
Just because the whole thing is a scam, doesn't mean the virus isn't real, and that variants aren't real. Because of their replication rate, viruses mutate all the time. But actual gain of function, that means anything substantial, is pretty rare.
I have seen no evidence that any variant has any statistically meaningful impact whatsoever on the overall virulence or transmissibility of the original SARS-CoV-2 virus. If anything it is getting less virulent over time, but that's pretty much meaningless since if you aren't vitamin deficient its mostly harmless anyways.
THAT is the scam.