I pointed this paragraph out because we know 9/11 was (at least in greater part) an inside job. Anyone who has looked at it for a day or two will conclude that, so why is he telling us that it isn't an inside job?
He knows too. He's lying to us with the authoritative voice of a "white hat" ex-spook.
It must be important. Maybe he is trying to get ahead of some news on the subject.
I could be bothered finishing it because what you're saying is so clearly true.
This is the kind of thing someone who knows NSCWIC. It's almost like the reader should take away the opposite of what he writes, and it feels completely transparent.
For what exactly ?
For those article ? https://edwardsnowden.substack.com/p/conspiracy-pt1
What do you have to research really ?
If there is nothing to it that's cool just figured if it was y'all could pick it apart is all.
Ok,maybe 9/11 and Iraq according to u/propertyofUniverse can be some clues somehow,but it looks like all.
There is any open research about:
oh,well - maybe then those post of Lin about Tom Hanks ?
Not mentioning I don't see operative groups working or coordinating here. Q ordered us something https://qagg.news/?read=4509 - do we do this order ?
I'll just explain what I meant.
I pointed this paragraph out because we know 9/11 was (at least in greater part) an inside job. Anyone who has looked at it for a day or two will conclude that, so why is he telling us that it isn't an inside job? He knows too. He's lying to us with the authoritative voice of a "white hat" ex-spook.
It must be important. Maybe he is trying to get ahead of some news on the subject.
According to Q Snowden is rather NOT on our side.
https://qagg.news/?q=snowden https://qagg.news/?q=snowden&page=2
I could be bothered finishing it because what you're saying is so clearly true.
This is the kind of thing someone who knows NSCWIC. It's almost like the reader should take away the opposite of what he writes, and it feels completely transparent.
Eyes on !