I'm working on some Cabal History research and I'm piecing together a rough timeline of when each secret society was "incorporated" into the Satanic Cabal we know today. Masons weren't always bad. This book's intro may be an indicator of the moment in time they were infiltrated and taken over. 1827.
(www.sacred-texts.com)
Cabal History Theory
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (18)
sorted by:
I might read it but right now I am dealing with the statements in your post.
I'm not trying to be agro fren, I guess I just don't understand why anyone needs a secret society for anything good. Private? Sure.
I mean, how would anyone not in the group know they started out as good if your group is hidden/unknown?
Do we all agree they haven't been good in a LONG time? How could we possibly know the "secret society" was once good if we only have the current evil society's word on it? See where I am going here? Without transparency.....
I'm not agro either. It's just frustrating that everything you're concerned about is covered in the book's intro. Just about anyway.
Basically all you are asking is the same line of thinking this dude puts forth.
He sees no good use for the secret societies other than to be bait for bad actors to take over and use the lesser members to unwittingly do bad while abusing tradition to self-serve their own interests.
Personally, I think secret societies are useful if you are trying to overthrow a tyrannical British Empire and needed a basis of secret handshakes and cipher codes to relay important messages. Not so much use after the fact. Remind you of any Federal Agencies post WWII and the Cold War?
Kinda like unions, they all outlive their usefulness and then resolve to become the bad guy and cause problems to justify their continued existence in cleaning up the messes they resort to making -- all up until the point they just do evil shit because they can at the behest of corrupt Globalist Powers.
Ok gotcha. I might still read it. Thank you for fleshing it out more.
To your examples, I tend to prefer having "known" societies who can do some secret activities for good IF needed, but heavily regulated by non secret rules known to all members of said society. Kinda like America is supposed to be.
For distinction, by known societies, I mean with a full charter known to all who are members. My understanding of the bricks is there is very very little transparency to the majority of the members. It is a power pyramid.