I'm working on some Cabal History research and I'm piecing together a rough timeline of when each secret society was "incorporated" into the Satanic Cabal we know today. Masons weren't always bad. This book's intro may be an indicator of the moment in time they were infiltrated and taken over. 1827.
(www.sacred-texts.com)
Cabal History Theory
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (18)
sorted by:
You can see how the Masons would have acquired power. They could do stuff that no-one else could - somewhat like the big tech whizzes of today. They could even be sent abroad to work there.
So imagine you are living in medieval times when hardly anyone ventures further than the next village and these people are travelling to foreign lands.
Now think what they are doing. They are building all the famous buildings in the world. They will come across all the movers and shakers who have the wherewithall to finance castles and cathedrals.
Also, if your castle needs some secret rooms, hidey holes, secret passages or dungeons then the Masons will know about them. Knowledge is power.
They were doing all that centuries before Adam Weisshaupt founded the Illuminati so the megalomaniacs had had lots of time to infiltrate the corridors of masonic power and subvert the organisation.
The Catholic Church is similar. Once a hierarchy is seen as a powerbase then it starts to attract the "wrong sort" of people. People who want power above all else.
When it comes to the Catholic Church I have two views that I think in combination both sides will find issue with yet must admit it is the ideal nature of the Church.
I believe two things can be true at the same time:
The Vatican should not exist.
There is a Universal Church instituted by Jesus through his authority and Apostolic succession.
So, how can both these be?
Jesus handed the keys of the kingdom to Peter, this is well understood. The Apostles, in addition, took this to mean there must be 12 to take on the leadership and proselytization effort and one among them to hold those keys, which is why they replaced Judas and saw Peter as their leader, respectively.
It is clear, Jesus' intent was to create an organized Church with rites of succession proceeding from His Authority. When Peter did wrong, he was not dogmatically immune. Paul chastised the hell out of him, and rightly so:
So, what is the conclusion? Well, look at the actions of the Apostles. They didn't stay put. They went to the people who hadn't heard the Good News and they preached endlessly of the Merciful nature of God having sent His Son to die for all, Jew and Gentile alike. When Peter hid among his own, he was rightly chastised. Peter went to claim Rome, and was killed for it. The mission of the Leader is to lead, even if that means risking their own security and life to do it.
That is the only "Leader" a Church should have. All should be evangelizing sacrificial lambs emulating fully the life of Jesus. Giving their lives selflessly and flipping tables in the temple when need be.
What does that leave the Church, though? Simple. It must be fluid and move endlessly. Churches get built and established, given to those who will look after it, and then the Leaders of the Church must move on to evangelize. If such a Church begins to corrupt, the Leaders must return wielding the fury of God, flip the tables, and whip the money changers with reeds.
When body ceases to move, it rots. So too acts the body of the Church. Any who slow and take to the roots of the Earth for security will be taken by the Earth to their grave. The Holy Spirit is always moving, so too must the Body of the Church and its Leaders.
That's my vision of the One True Church established by Jesus.
The church is the body of Christ & it's being chased by the dragon. Notice how they were able to shut down churches because of "covid" That's because the 1160 'days' of protection (350 years) has passed. It's all in the Bible:
https://greatawakening.win/p/12jJZIPVET/the-rest-of--revelations-1220-is/