Simple deduction on "Spike Protein / Vaccine Shedding" has left me hopeful and with possibly good news. - The Great Awakening

Simple deduction on "Spike Protein / Vaccine Shedding" has left me hopeful and with possibly good news. 🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬

posted 3 years ago by sleepydude 3 years ago by sleepydude +59 / -0

I still have reservations as to how dangerous Spike Protein shedding may be, if it is actually happening at all.

There are two scenarios:

If Spike Protein shedding is real, and stooges close to the Cabal politicians are truly vaccinated, then the Cabal must have a preventable method they administer for themselves to avoid complications from Spike Proteins being transmitted from vaccinated peoples. This indicates a possible cure/preventive method therapy to deal with Spike Proteins for those who have been vaccinated.
If the above is false, and the Cabal politicians are willingly soaking in the Spike Proteins, then they either have a death wish (possible) or Spike Protein shedding is benign.

My conclusion? Don't worry about Spike Protein shedding. Do worry about those who have been vaccinated, as their concentration of the Spike Proteins is far higher than will ever rub off onto others through transmission.

My money is on Ivermectin and HCQ having been effective against the Spike Proteins all along. Either should be taken prophylactically by unvaccinated and vaccinated peoples alike to prevent all possible avenues of harm.

Thoughts?

Edit: To be clear, I'm softly working under the assumption Cabal members took saline or maybe B12 shots instead of the "vaccine."

42 comments

42 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (42)

sorted by:

▲ 2 ▼

– propertyofUniverse 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

I think that the shedding is not benign since it seems to be able to cause serious menstrual issues, but I reckon that it is preventable by prophylaxis, treatment or avoiding the shedding source. I currently think of shedding as toxic rather than contagious, this way, the elites could limit their exposure to shedding.

The shedding effects are probably mostly self limiting as well, you get better soon after the exposure stops. This is not so for the vax, which keeps making spike proteins in the body for some unknown time.

I also think, based on my own experience, that people are differently affected by shedding. This could be due to either different sensitivity to the spike protein for different people shedded on, or it could be due to a strong immune response to the spike protein after meeting it before, I think that happened to me, since I had previously had a bad case of the 'rona

It's all good thinking you are doing here sleepydude.

permalink parent save report block reply