Does anyone know of any real arguments Q might not be real? All I seem to hear is retarded shit like "Q's predictions have never come true" from cunts who don't even know what it is
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (66)
sorted by:
The entire Q operation is a resounding success thus far. There is no more need for new posts. Q can fade away because the effort to instruct the People on how to question the Government and Press has been sufficiently achieved to the aims of the counter-insurgency. We act autonomously now, without need for the Q mentorship.
It is fair to view it all as a pacification effort, but that's not a bad thing. In fact, it is intentional.
Please read fully the following Q post and linked manual. It will address literally all your doubts into Q's authenticity.
https://qalerts.app/?n=4008
The Q operation's mission is a part of the COIN Counter Insurgency Guidelines. Emphasis on page 17 onwards, detailing the Intelligence flow (watch the water).
The goals are to enforce national pride and trust in the Government(Military), prevent domestic uprisings through the insurgents' use of divisive propaganda tactics and tribalism, secure a solid economic state, and create a team that can quickly and effectively counter disinformation read "The Information Contest" on page 21 as soon as it is spun by the Media.
The Military has chosen the population-centric approach to avoid open bloodshed as much as possible.
Trust in Legislature and Judiciaries is at an all time low, but trust in Military and police pre-Covid was at an all time high under Trump.
An insurgency REQUIRES a push back from the population to work. If they can't muster up "white supremacist" groups to support their narrative and confront ANTIFA in an all-out street war, they lose.
The Counter-Insurgency requires a passive population so the Military can act freely without shooting the people they are sworn to protect.
So what part of this Q drop is supposed to make me no longer doubt that Q is a high level government operative?
Literally everything he says in that post is rehashing the document he cited, which is publicly available.
This is a book report over something he read. I am teaching students right now who are writing exactly this type of thing.
I’m not sure how this proves what you claim. All it proves is that he likes reading government documents about warfare, which is true of 95% of GAW.
Q is literally giving you the playbook that made the operation.
Q is a small aspect of the intelligence arm of the Counter Insurgency taking place under the US Military heads' jurisdiction.
What Q is doing checks all the boxes in the COIN method of increasing faith in the government and establishing a group that is trained to quickly get on top of the Propaganda Media.
I can tell you didn't bother to read the guidelines, because Q is tracking with this section exactly:
...
The ONLY way the Military could effectively succeed in the battle for narrative control is to create a massive thinktank that could counter the Media's narrative supremacy faster than they can spin lies up. There is not enough money in the world to do that, even if they could keep the thinktank hidden and safe from spying insurgents.
Enter Q.
The Q Operation is a grass-roots/crowdsourced thinktank used to counter Propaganda narrative shifts and to disseminate the Truth and whittle apart the lies.
The only group you can target that has the abilities, tools, and wherewithal to take down the Media's Propaganda are shitposters.
Enter Anons/Autists.
The cover of anonymity on boards like 4Chan and 8kun allowed for uncontrollable passage of ideas. By recruiting this group, and giving them a literal game/puzzle to solve, Q conditioned them psychologically to find reward in taking down Propaganda lies.
Q is a Military Operation, plain and simple. The strategy has been used before, but never domestically, at least to this scale. Probable deniability is essential in protecting all parties involved, and is used extensively. That you are questioning if Q is real or not is the greatest defense Q has, and is a necessary component of the Counter Insurgency. The Government must look like they are in control, not the Counter Insurgents.
If the Media could prove 100% Q is real and that Flynn or Trump are responsible for the Operation would immediately be able to claim their victory -- being able to levy charges against Patriots under pretenses of a coup. There is a fine line between Insurgent and Counter Insurgent, and domestic fights heavily muddy those waters.
If you can't see it after reading through the guidelines and piecing it together, then guess what...
You don't have to.
The Operation is a success, Anons autonomously act to counter Propaganda as they were trained to do, Q no longer needs to post, and the People of the United States are swelling with Patriotism in a way never before seen.
Read the manual through, and you'll know. We won.
The population-centric approach has worked. The Insurgency is over. There is no way they can reverse the Patriotism and support of the Nation. They can't work fast enough to divide us. There are too many hands against them.
It's over. The DeepState is dead.
Q being a LARP is FAR TOO EFFECTIVE for it to be a guy in his basement. Had there been no Q, we would not have this swell of Patriotism and anti-Propaganda sentiment in the common population. Admit it, even if a LARP, it has been overwhelmingly positive for the fate of our Nation.
I am reading every word you say and understanding it.
But I don’t think you’re understanding me.
You’re telling me what you believe to be true, because you accept Q is who he claims to be.
What I’m asking for is proof positive, undeniable, that Q is actually this intelligence arm that you believe he is.
I understand that IF I believe Q is doing these things, then this is how I would interpret Q’s posts.
But if you’re like me and the majority of other people, you haven’t accepted yet that Q is the intelligence entity that he claims he is. So the narrative you’re delivering doesn’t make much of an impact, because you haven’t yet proven the foundation of the argument, which is that Q is who he claims to be.
Paraphrasing a publicly-available government document on counterinsurgencies isn’t proof of that.
If, say, he was paraphrasing and then leaking to us for our own verification a highly classified intelligence document that is then in some way validated by the agency he leaked it from, THAT would be evidence that Q actually has info that nobody else does.
Has anything like that happened without me noticing ?
I can’t simply accept that Q is an unverifiable agent and that the inability to verify his credentials is proof that he’s real. That’s a non-falsifiable claim. That’s a strategy that only works when discussing God, and I don’t think Q is God.
If that did happen, the Operation would have been a failure. People's lives are on the line.
What we got are proofs; numerous time-sensitive cases of probable deniability that, when taken all together indicate a statistical impossibility that it is simply coincidence.
Honestly, what more can I do to convince you? Probably nothing, because you're not willing to be convinced by anyone other than yourself. Which leaves you with one option:
Read through the first 2500 Q posts.
That section of time has the largest volume of proof events. The sheer volume of "happy coincidence" events coinciding with Trump's Twitter feed is shocking.
In summation...
Effectively, you're asking me to explain in detail the proofs in something as extensive as the Old Testament which indicate it is based on real historic events without having actually read the Old Testament AND also not even bothering to look at alternate sources of History as well. Which leaves me with no foundation to begin making connections.
In other words, no matter HOW I phrase it, your lack of prerequisite knowledge in the matter means you'll never be able to make the connections. If you continue to not read what is absolutely required to understand just how extensively Q has been proven, I can't help you. There's a term for that state of mind and it's called willful ignorance.