You're talking to the wrong dude for that line of thought, my friend.

I'll read/investigate just about anything, no matter how asinine it might seem at its premise. I'm of the "include all angles, regardless of where they originate, and eliminate the fallacies" camp.

No one should be happy settling on the knowledge they have. If you stop learning, you stop living, and you don't know what you don't know.

My name is accurate in more way than one. I'm always half asleep, both physically and psychologically, which allows me to explore the craziest notions and not get too attached. Most of my family, as I have come to find out, do not have this filter and I've now learned to be careful in sharing the more insane theories I read because they begin to think that I think they are real.

As far as Q goes, I think the primary conflict with your understanding is this:

I'm trying to show you WHAT Q is.

You want to know WHO Q is.

The latter will likely never come to pass, so your disappointment will be perpetual.

If you want hard proofs, without doing the work yourself, there are tons of videos compiling them all.

Is that what you want?

This one and its sequel convinced me that it wasn't just mere coincidence: https://www.bitchute.com/video/4cQc9X9l0a5Y/

If you won't read it from the horses mouth, and you won't watch the above, and you won't look look at what I've provided in retrospect, then I can't help you.

Which is the problem, really. Normies just can't think like autists. Some brains just can't put the pieces together without it being spelled out for them, I guess. Some people can solve picture mazes by sight alone, and some people can't. No one is to blame, it's just how it is.