Hitler simply wanted to move them out of Germany, because they tend to be behind situations like the conditions of Weimar Germany. And The jews declared war on germany before hitler did, anyways. I disagree with Hitler philosophy that people need to be ruled with a strong hand in order to be good, but Hitler actually cared a bit about the people under him which is why he did what he did.
I have simple morality question for you personally. Is circumcision moral?
The holocaust was real. Too many eyewitnesses to it.
This is why I specified the gassing and killing of jews. I'm not denying they got sent to camps in an attempt to purge germany of them. I'm denying that they were gassed and killed. That was a lie. See the link I posted for more detail.
If the creator of the universe commands it, it is moral.
If you think the first thing "God" commands you to do to babies fresh out of the womb is chop off part of their genitals against their will, thats not god you're worshipping buddy, its satan calling himself god.
Just because something claiming itself to be god tells you to do something doesn't make the thing right or wrong. You're basically just taking the personal responsibility for your actions off of yourself and claiming that "god told me to do it its ok".
I can turn the argument on its head and say that the soldiers supposedly gassing and killing jews were just doing what they were told to. They had no moral responsibility to not gas and kill jews.
Zycline b was not a gas, its a slow time release pellet and not efficient in killing ppl. Not to mention expensive, why not put them all in an air tight room and let them die from lack of oxygen or put an engine exhaust in there ? Germans known to be efficient and zyclone b was not a good way to kill ppl. No one knew of the Holocaust till after the war…lol…every claimed gad chamber was on the soveit side of the iron curtain …ironic? Roosevelt does right before allied troops get to berlin..patton told to stand down…patton dies in mysterious keep crash a a month latet….think think think friens. The media is a weapon..,connect the dots
Oh, nice. So you're not actually going to discuss the morality. You basically just attempted to change the subject and turn it into a different debate, if Christianity (or all religion) is real.
Thats not subject. The subject is the morality of chopping of the genitals of babies against their will, fresh out of the womb. Is it right or wrong to chop off parts of people when they have not agreed to such an action? Is it right or wrong to do that at all? So far all you have done is say that its not your problem because you think god told you its ok so that absolves you of any responsibility. But I guess that answers the question anyways.
You're not going to even consider if that action is actually right or wrong because theres no way in hell if anyone thinks about it for 3 seconds you come out with the response "yeah, that sounds like a good thing to do, god wants me to chop off baby penis. Why? fuck if I know but cut that sucker off. Might as well suck the blood out of it too, dont wanna waste that!"
I'll give you credit though, you've got some pretty good pilpul skills there! At first I thought you were just a larp but it looks like I've got a real jew here. Rather than argue about the subject, you use the exact same debate tactics Hitler himself described.
The more I argued with them, the better I came to know their dialectic. First they counted on the stupidity of their adversary, and then, when there was no other way out, they themselves simply played stupid. If all this didn't help, they pretended not to understand, or, if challenged, they changed the subject in a hurry, quoted platitudes which, if you accepted them, they immediately related to entirely different matters, and then, if again attacked, gave ground and pretended not to know exactly what you were talking about. Whenever you tried to attack one of these apostles, your hand closed on a jelly-like slime which divided up and poured through your fingers, but in the next moment collected again. But if you really struck one of these fellows so telling a blow that, observed by the audience, he couldn't help but agree, and if you believed that this had taken you at least one step forward, your amazement was great the next day. The Jew had not the slightest recollection of the day before, he rattled off his same old nonsense as though nothing at all had happened, and, if indignantly challenged, affected amazement; he couldn't remember a thing, except that he had proved the correctness of his assertions the previous day.
Sometimes I stood there thunderstruck.
I didn't know what to be more amazed at: the agility of their tongues or their virtuosity at lying.
Gradually I began to hate them.
And I'm not denying there were gas chambers either. Nice try again. I'm denying they were used for, again, the gassing and killing of jews. See the link I posted the first time to see how little evidence (literally none) there is for gas chambers that kill people.
The gassing and killng of jews is a jewish lie, presented by the jews in hollywood.
"One Third of the Holocaust" - https://www.bitchute.com/video/MQxyferx8mht/
Hitler simply wanted to move them out of Germany, because they tend to be behind situations like the conditions of Weimar Germany. And The jews declared war on germany before hitler did, anyways. I disagree with Hitler philosophy that people need to be ruled with a strong hand in order to be good, but Hitler actually cared a bit about the people under him which is why he did what he did.
I have simple morality question for you personally. Is circumcision moral?
I am sorry. The holocaust was real. Too many eyewitnesses to it. Just as there were to the voter fraud (which they also try to deny)
Circumcision is part of the covenant between Abraham and G-d.
If the creator of the universe commands it, it is moral.
Asking if it is immoral -- might as well be the serpent asking Eve if it's really wrong to eat the forbidden fruit.
This is why I specified the gassing and killing of jews. I'm not denying they got sent to camps in an attempt to purge germany of them. I'm denying that they were gassed and killed. That was a lie. See the link I posted for more detail.
If you think the first thing "God" commands you to do to babies fresh out of the womb is chop off part of their genitals against their will, thats not god you're worshipping buddy, its satan calling himself god.
Just because something claiming itself to be god tells you to do something doesn't make the thing right or wrong. You're basically just taking the personal responsibility for your actions off of yourself and claiming that "god told me to do it its ok".
I can turn the argument on its head and say that the soldiers supposedly gassing and killing jews were just doing what they were told to. They had no moral responsibility to not gas and kill jews.
Zycline b was not a gas, its a slow time release pellet and not efficient in killing ppl. Not to mention expensive, why not put them all in an air tight room and let them die from lack of oxygen or put an engine exhaust in there ? Germans known to be efficient and zyclone b was not a good way to kill ppl. No one knew of the Holocaust till after the war…lol…every claimed gad chamber was on the soveit side of the iron curtain …ironic? Roosevelt does right before allied troops get to berlin..patton told to stand down…patton dies in mysterious keep crash a a month latet….think think think friens. The media is a weapon..,connect the dots
Look, I'm not interested in people denying he gas chambers. Just not. Too well established.
Your argument at the end doesn't work. The soldiers were commanded by men. Abraham was commanded by G-d.
If the G-d of Torah is false, then by extension, so is Christianity.
Oh, nice. So you're not actually going to discuss the morality. You basically just attempted to change the subject and turn it into a different debate, if Christianity (or all religion) is real.
Thats not subject. The subject is the morality of chopping of the genitals of babies against their will, fresh out of the womb. Is it right or wrong to chop off parts of people when they have not agreed to such an action? Is it right or wrong to do that at all? So far all you have done is say that its not your problem because you think god told you its ok so that absolves you of any responsibility. But I guess that answers the question anyways.
You're not going to even consider if that action is actually right or wrong because theres no way in hell if anyone thinks about it for 3 seconds you come out with the response "yeah, that sounds like a good thing to do, god wants me to chop off baby penis. Why? fuck if I know but cut that sucker off. Might as well suck the blood out of it too, dont wanna waste that!"
I'll give you credit though, you've got some pretty good pilpul skills there! At first I thought you were just a larp but it looks like I've got a real jew here. Rather than argue about the subject, you use the exact same debate tactics Hitler himself described.
And I'm not denying there were gas chambers either. Nice try again. I'm denying they were used for, again, the gassing and killing of jews. See the link I posted the first time to see how little evidence (literally none) there is for gas chambers that kill people.
Man you people sure are obsessed with children's genetalia. You really think God would command such a thing? Satanic fuck.
I didn't bring it up. Some other asshole did.
Doesn't matter who brought it up. It matters who supports it. Sick fuck.