Dude. It’s not a technicality. It’s a law. It’s designed to prevent people from voting twice. The article talks about what happens inside 30 days and even temporary moves. Think about how slow government operates. If you move before the election and your residency isn’t updated but you somehow become eligible in your new location and you vote twice, that’s illegal. What if one person submitted multiple change of address forms? What if someone steals your vote in your old or new locale? If that number of total address changes is abnormally high and the margin in the race is unusually low it indicates real systemic fraud. And if I remember correctly, GA was one of those states where many people were registered to addresses where buildings didn’t even exist. They uncovered lots of people registered to vote in those places. All this stuff ties together. Didn’t Democrats say they were going to “move” to Georgia for the supposed Senate runoff? Pretty sure Andrew Yang did, until he moved to NYC to suck as a mayoral candidate. This author is on to something. But perhaps more importantly, this “technicality” is the law. And if that law isn’t enforced, it’s likely others are not. Which goes back to my original statement: it’s designed to prevent fraud. If GA voters and legislators feel that is not the best way to achieve that, they should change the law. Laws should not be optional. Especially election law. If you try to place nice you open yourself up to be taken advantage of. And guess what? The minute discretion becomes the accepted norm is the minute we end up with a demented loser who cheated more than any candidate in the history of our country, as President.
SMH... what if ... what if... what if... I understand that problem. And I agree voting twice is a bad thing. Nowhere in that article did I see where it talked about thousands of people have been proven to have voted twice. It talked about people that moved and didn't fill out the right paperwork. Which can indicate possible fraud... POSSIBLE. All I'm saying is we can't be so zealous in our pursuit of fraud that we strip legit votes from citizens who did nothing wrong but miss some arbitrary time limit.
As long as they only voted once in one place I don't have a problem with it AND I HAVE FUCKING LIVED MY ENTIRE 50 YEARS OF LIFE IN GA.
We are dealing with computer and ballot fraud of a scale of hundreds of thousands of votes and this is what you think we should hang our hats on to flip GA back to red? A bureaucratic technicality involving 50k votes that just hands power to the government to strip voting rights away from citizens who don't follow the rules? If they feel like enforcing the rules... which we know they will selectively do if given the chance. Do you have any idea how insane that is?
Uh… “strip voting rights away from citizens who don't follow the rules?“ Yeah, I think if someone is too lazy (your words), too busy, too uninformed to figure out how vote LEGALLY their vote should not count. It’s that simple. You’re worried about protecting the votes of people who were voting outside the law, whether intentional or not. I’m worried about disenfranchising the 5MM GA voters, and the tens of millions of Americans, who legally cast their vote in favor of protecting those who couldn’t be bothered to follow the law. By the way, this law prevents funny business at the local level, not just the national elections. The focus is obviously on the Presidential race because we’re unhappy with the results. But there are probably several down ballot races impacted too. If you leave your county, you should not have a right to impact the outcome of that local election - I don’t care if you don’t have time to fill out a form or not.
From my perspective, 35,000-50,000 changes of address immediately preceding an election seems awfully high. So from that perspective something is off. Look at how they responded to this - they told this guy you can’t know this because you don’t have the SSN numbers. It wasn’t, “Here is the data showing you are wrong…” it was, “You can’t be right because you don’t have information you wouldn’t ever have anyway.” He pointed out there were voter ID numbers that could prove his point. Suddenly that changed their tune because they’ve realized they certified false results. To me, their response tells me this author is over the target. They got caught and they know it.
Do I think that there were multiple paths to cheating in this election? Yup. Sure do. Haven’t stopped thinking about seeing vote tallies switch in front of my eyes for months now. As we’ve seen, proving machine fraud is difficult and nobody seems to want to hear it. But this… it’s easy to see and understand. My primary concern is seeing these election results decertified as soon as possible. What these clowns are doing now is incredibly destructive. I want to undermine the cabal, because I believe both sides were in on it, and delegitimize everything they are trying to do. If this gets us there sooner and positions us to fix the election we will have an easier time uncovering these other methods of cheating and addressing them. It’s also the easiest way to get these bad actors out - prove they aren’t properly administering elections. I’m not so proud that winning this thing through singles and doubles seems like such a bad thing. A home run would be great but I’m not content to wait for that, or strike out again, in hopes that happens. We should take the small wind and build momentum from them.
I didn't read you whole wall of text. Look I live in GA. People have been fleeing Atlanta for two decades. At the time of this election the economy was roaring here. Which meant tons of leftists from blue states were moving to Atlanta and tons of locals were fleeing out of Atlanta. Was it 50k... probibly not but it was a lot of people.
Everyone seems to think that its more important to follow the rules/law than it is for people to maintain their rights, but the type of system you are setting up gives all the power to the bureaucrats. Can't you see how short sighted that is? Can't you see how that is what got us where we are today. We've been handing power to the government... to bureaucrats... for decades. When did rules become more important than common sense?
Have you considered that there are people out there like me that have NEVER EVER actually moved before? People that have lived in the same place for 30 or 40 or even 60 years. Lived there so long that the last time they moved they were either a child or the rules themselves didn't even exist? So you solution to their lack of knowledge or yes possibly laziness is to strip them of their power to control the government? In effect to give power over them to others?
You might as well be suggesting they become a slave because they broke the rules. Ooopps here is your collar.
In your zeal to deal with election fraud you're making it worse. May I suggest you take a deep breath and think long and hard about what is important. Rules are important. They are not all important. Think for yourself. Use your common sense. The goal is for every legal citizen to get their one legal vote. The goal is not to follow the rules... government rules. The goal is not to blindly enforce rules made by the government. That's what slaves and robots do.
I'm going to say it one more time. The goal is for every legal citizen to get their one legal vote. EVERY citizen.
Dude. It’s not a technicality. It’s a law. It’s designed to prevent people from voting twice. The article talks about what happens inside 30 days and even temporary moves. Think about how slow government operates. If you move before the election and your residency isn’t updated but you somehow become eligible in your new location and you vote twice, that’s illegal. What if one person submitted multiple change of address forms? What if someone steals your vote in your old or new locale? If that number of total address changes is abnormally high and the margin in the race is unusually low it indicates real systemic fraud. And if I remember correctly, GA was one of those states where many people were registered to addresses where buildings didn’t even exist. They uncovered lots of people registered to vote in those places. All this stuff ties together. Didn’t Democrats say they were going to “move” to Georgia for the supposed Senate runoff? Pretty sure Andrew Yang did, until he moved to NYC to suck as a mayoral candidate. This author is on to something. But perhaps more importantly, this “technicality” is the law. And if that law isn’t enforced, it’s likely others are not. Which goes back to my original statement: it’s designed to prevent fraud. If GA voters and legislators feel that is not the best way to achieve that, they should change the law. Laws should not be optional. Especially election law. If you try to place nice you open yourself up to be taken advantage of. And guess what? The minute discretion becomes the accepted norm is the minute we end up with a demented loser who cheated more than any candidate in the history of our country, as President.
SMH... what if ... what if... what if... I understand that problem. And I agree voting twice is a bad thing. Nowhere in that article did I see where it talked about thousands of people have been proven to have voted twice. It talked about people that moved and didn't fill out the right paperwork. Which can indicate possible fraud... POSSIBLE. All I'm saying is we can't be so zealous in our pursuit of fraud that we strip legit votes from citizens who did nothing wrong but miss some arbitrary time limit.
As long as they only voted once in one place I don't have a problem with it AND I HAVE FUCKING LIVED MY ENTIRE 50 YEARS OF LIFE IN GA.
We are dealing with computer and ballot fraud of a scale of hundreds of thousands of votes and this is what you think we should hang our hats on to flip GA back to red? A bureaucratic technicality involving 50k votes that just hands power to the government to strip voting rights away from citizens who don't follow the rules? If they feel like enforcing the rules... which we know they will selectively do if given the chance. Do you have any idea how insane that is?
Uh… “strip voting rights away from citizens who don't follow the rules?“ Yeah, I think if someone is too lazy (your words), too busy, too uninformed to figure out how vote LEGALLY their vote should not count. It’s that simple. You’re worried about protecting the votes of people who were voting outside the law, whether intentional or not. I’m worried about disenfranchising the 5MM GA voters, and the tens of millions of Americans, who legally cast their vote in favor of protecting those who couldn’t be bothered to follow the law. By the way, this law prevents funny business at the local level, not just the national elections. The focus is obviously on the Presidential race because we’re unhappy with the results. But there are probably several down ballot races impacted too. If you leave your county, you should not have a right to impact the outcome of that local election - I don’t care if you don’t have time to fill out a form or not.
From my perspective, 35,000-50,000 changes of address immediately preceding an election seems awfully high. So from that perspective something is off. Look at how they responded to this - they told this guy you can’t know this because you don’t have the SSN numbers. It wasn’t, “Here is the data showing you are wrong…” it was, “You can’t be right because you don’t have information you wouldn’t ever have anyway.” He pointed out there were voter ID numbers that could prove his point. Suddenly that changed their tune because they’ve realized they certified false results. To me, their response tells me this author is over the target. They got caught and they know it.
Do I think that there were multiple paths to cheating in this election? Yup. Sure do. Haven’t stopped thinking about seeing vote tallies switch in front of my eyes for months now. As we’ve seen, proving machine fraud is difficult and nobody seems to want to hear it. But this… it’s easy to see and understand. My primary concern is seeing these election results decertified as soon as possible. What these clowns are doing now is incredibly destructive. I want to undermine the cabal, because I believe both sides were in on it, and delegitimize everything they are trying to do. If this gets us there sooner and positions us to fix the election we will have an easier time uncovering these other methods of cheating and addressing them. It’s also the easiest way to get these bad actors out - prove they aren’t properly administering elections. I’m not so proud that winning this thing through singles and doubles seems like such a bad thing. A home run would be great but I’m not content to wait for that, or strike out again, in hopes that happens. We should take the small wind and build momentum from them.
I didn't read you whole wall of text. Look I live in GA. People have been fleeing Atlanta for two decades. At the time of this election the economy was roaring here. Which meant tons of leftists from blue states were moving to Atlanta and tons of locals were fleeing out of Atlanta. Was it 50k... probibly not but it was a lot of people.
Everyone seems to think that its more important to follow the rules/law than it is for people to maintain their rights, but the type of system you are setting up gives all the power to the bureaucrats. Can't you see how short sighted that is? Can't you see how that is what got us where we are today. We've been handing power to the government... to bureaucrats... for decades. When did rules become more important than common sense?
Have you considered that there are people out there like me that have NEVER EVER actually moved before? People that have lived in the same place for 30 or 40 or even 60 years. Lived there so long that the last time they moved they were either a child or the rules themselves didn't even exist? So you solution to their lack of knowledge or yes possibly laziness is to strip them of their power to control the government? In effect to give power over them to others?
You might as well be suggesting they become a slave because they broke the rules. Ooopps here is your collar.
In your zeal to deal with election fraud you're making it worse. May I suggest you take a deep breath and think long and hard about what is important. Rules are important. They are not all important. Think for yourself. Use your common sense. The goal is for every legal citizen to get their one legal vote. The goal is not to follow the rules... government rules. The goal is not to blindly enforce rules made by the government. That's what slaves and robots do.
I'm going to say it one more time. The goal is for every legal citizen to get their one legal vote. EVERY citizen.
What the fuck is wrong with you?!?!