2
ForThisiStand 2 points ago +2 / -0

You can order domestically from here: https://sevencells.com/

They have a live chat to answer your dosing questions. It took me a week when they had just been guests on Daniel Horowitz and Steve Deace’s shows. They were busy. As far as I know it is compounded in and ships from Florida. Also, https://www.ivermectincan.com/ is a US based medical practice helping people get ivermectin. My wife used them because seven cells viewed her medical history as more complicated. Ivermectincan is the Dr. Molly James clinic. It cost $300, including the consult. They gave dosage advice for lots of compounds and are sending my wife IVM and a few other supplements from a pharmacy in Florida. She already received a call from the pharmacy.

There are definitely ways to get this stuff without importing from overseas.

1
ForThisiStand 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you want ivermectin, you can get it at https://sevencells.com/. They are US based and I believe compound right in Florida. I heard the CEO on the Steve Deace show. You plug in your weight and how many pills you want. You’ll answer some health screening questions. I think it took a little over a week to get my ivermectin. All told it was $225 shipped. Unfortunately, it’s expensive because you’re in essence buying the pharmaceutical grade IVM on the black market. It is legit though. I have enough for ten weeks of prophylactic or ten days of sick care. My wife was denied from sevencells.com because she is asthmatic and we believe they cited a side effect. I have read that the amino acid L-arginine is helpful for asthmatics against Covid. However, I actually contacted Steve and asked for advice because I remembered him saying he too was asthmatic. He personally responded and suggested my wife contact the James Clinic (https://www.ivermectincan.com/). She has a consult with them scheduled to try to get her some prophylactic ivermectin.

I am currently on the FLCCC prophylactic protocol minus the ivermectin. I’m waiting for my wife to get hers and we may start it together. She’s been great and we are in sync on not getting the vax. I wanted solidarity in a prophylactic/early treatment protocol before I started. Side note - we all got a cold after Turkey day. On this protocol, which I am following by the letter, I got rid of the sickness in about 24 hours and congestion was cleared in 3.5 days. That is unheard of for me. So I believe the protocol does boost your immune system.

For long haul, I would recommend this: https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/i-recover-protocol/

I’m fairly certain the James Clinic uses this. I’d contact them and ask about the Long Haul treatment. There’s enough doctors that are helping out there. Seek them out and end this cycle of frustration.

Good luck to you!

2
ForThisiStand 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s worth reading the specifics of the law. They define a child as 2 months to 18 years old. They specify that any child must have a range of shots as outlined by US Public Health Service and is approved. Those first shots, which they now want to include Covid, are not tied to school attendance, as many are administered when the kids are younger. It later says that if your child is not vaccinated and tries to attend school the health commissioner’s office will get involved. In NYS, if you, for example, do not perform a Lead test on your child at age 2, you will get a call from the DoH. Even if, for example, the test kits are not available and they are aware of it.

So basically, what this dumpster fire bill is teeing up is that the state will add this to the list of “required” vaccines for kids, not necessarily those of school age. They can harass you as they see fit. I’m sure this eventually sets up making arguments that you are unfit to be a parent.

Let’s go NYS. I mean Brandon. Let’s Go Brandon.

1
ForThisiStand 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh, I was specifically referring to folks citing high housing costs. But yeah, I know of a company local to me relocating to TN. We’re a red part of the state but doesn’t mean the folks relocating are, so your point is well taken. If we end up moving we’re not bringing compromising politics.

3
ForThisiStand 3 points ago +3 / -0

My wife and I have begun conversations about leaving NYS. We have young kids and both our families are relatively close by. I did not grow up with that kind of proximity to my grandparents, she did. We are reluctant to give that up unless it’s absolutely necessary. Everyday Hochul and our legislature presses closer to our red lines. Vax mandates for kids will be one for sure.

Anyway, I have spent a lot of time in NC for work. I love it there, but I took it off our list once they installed Cooper. It’s hard for me to see how this can be prevented in the future. Is the legislature taking steps for fortify your elections that can bypass Coopers signature? I’m actually not asking sarcastically. If we do this, we’re going to make a red state redder. I’m just not up for moving to a purple state that’s being compromised to a blue one. We’d be leaving that hellish environment and it would be painful to be a part of that slide, powerless to stop it.

Disappointing about TN’s cost of living. It was on our list. If we end up giving up big careers to move I definitely don’t want a high cost of living.

1
ForThisiStand 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://www.biospace.com/article/more-data-suggests-over-the-counter-nasal-spray-is-effective-against-covid-19-virus/

Buy some Xlear nasal spray. I saw this study in a few places. I think even yahoo talked about it. If you can find NAC, it will increase his glutathione production and prompt a strong immune response. I would also suggest turmeric/curcumin as an anti-inflammatory. Finally, FLCCC added Black Seed Oil in addition to or in place of ivermectin. FLCCC also has a long covid or severe case protocol. It’s worth looking into.

2
ForThisiStand 2 points ago +2 / -0

Did Fauci say that 50-60% of the population was asymptomatic? If the majority are sick and never tested, doesn’t that make the percentage of deaths infinitesimally smaller? Wouldn’t that officially put it well below the flu?

Obviously I knew this all along, but he just admitted it.

by gamepwn
4
ForThisiStand 4 points ago +4 / -0

100% correct. It uses double stranded DNA that tells your cells to make mRNA, which starts the spike proteins production. It too, is new technology.

3
ForThisiStand 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hold on. I live in NY too. The article is incorrect but what is happening is newsworthy BECAUSE this is a crisis of her own doing. Yes, in the event of a medical emergency, I would expect a good Governor to utilize all the resources at her disposal. But if you listen to her speech, she is giving herself emergency powers to activate the National Guard due to the shortage of workers. Except her stupid mandate is the cause of this emergency. So she created a problem, stood her ground because she is afraid of looking weak, and now that people are following through she is making her own solution, which involves more Emergency Powers for her, granted by herself. This bitch also recently invoked God and likened herself to Jesus by asking for people to be her apostles and spread the word about the vaccines. She’s too dumb to realize that when NY’s elections were rigged, they didn’t do it because she was #2 on the ticket.

As a lifelong, conservative Upstate New Yorker, we are under siege. And you can expect that NY and CA are the proving grounds for what they want to try in the rest of the country.

Cut through the BS in this particular article and the rest is absolutely newsworthy. And scary!

2
ForThisiStand 2 points ago +2 / -0

Rush Limbaugh used to say polls don’t reflect public opinion, they help shape them. I can still hear him saying it through the Golden EIB microphone. I miss that guy…

0
ForThisiStand 0 points ago +1 / -1

There’s hundreds of vaccine studies on this website. This is a big and scary claim to make. Has anyone been able to pinpoint the study she is referring to? What are they claiming is the size of the study?

Aren’t the clinical trials different from the EUA? As much as I want to believe all of this, I am having a hard time imagining that at a huge scale they had different doses and placebos. The clinical trials are typically smaller in scale, where in my mind, it makes sense to try different doses to settle the doses you would use for the EUA. My understanding is that is what they did, BUT, I thought they ended up giving the placebo group real doses because of the “dangers” of Covid.

I’m not saying this isn’t real. But out of all the things I’ve heard about these vaccines, this sort of feels like misinformation. And you can look at any of my posts, I am definitely not supportive of these things. I’ve misinterpreted things and stated things incorrectly. We need to be spot on with our claims. We are fighting an information war.

11
ForThisiStand 11 points ago +11 / -0

THIS IS NOT TRUE!! There is a lot of misinformation out there about the J&J vaccine. While it is NOT a mRNA vaccine, it does use double stranded DNA, which infiltrates your cell and tells your cell to produce the mRNA. In my mind it’s mRNA with a middleman that happens to be DNA. I was misinformed by MANY medical and pharmaceutical professionals that it was the “old” attenuated virus technology. That is not true. It has been used once, in Ebola vaccines and was released last year. The fact that I was mislead turned me off. I did take the bait and did my own research. I hate to post a NYT article but it’s helped me prove some leftists wrong about how misleading they’ve been about these things. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/health/johnson-johnson-covid-19-vaccine.html

1
ForThisiStand 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol, the title of the piece is a joke… “Hundreds of New Yorkers…” Followed by the first bullet that thousands of New Yorkers protested at Town Hall. Shoddy journalism at its best.

2
ForThisiStand 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lol, I didn’t think I’d start a whole comment chain. I was thinking it was Arby’s but that is, “We have the meats!”

28
ForThisiStand 28 points ago +31 / -3

Dear God, Please, do not let this be a nothing burger. I’m hungry. Only a big beef burger will do. None of this Beyond fake food, please. We’ve been eating that fake pretend stuff for 8 long months now. I’ll even forego mustard or any toppings. Just please let this be the real deal. Faithfully Yours, ForThisIStand

1
ForThisiStand 1 point ago +1 / -0

This article is interesting and I wouldn’t put it past him. But I heard on local talk radio this morning that he has filed for his pension when he leaves office. So he has started something.

2
ForThisiStand 2 points ago +2 / -0

The only thing I can think of is a sense of urgency to view his site more often? Limited time viewing means you might miss something. Just a thought. I’m not sure what else.

1
ForThisiStand 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think it depends on what you read and how specific they make a statement. Generally speaking, if a virus is lethal it kills off its hosts and cannot transmit easily. It’s not a living thing. It’s genetic code that creates an immune response in the body. Let’s think about Covid I’m general. In the beginning China was “supposedly” stacking bodies. The earliest epicenters in the US had higher death rates in the most at risk people. Overtime that death rate relative to the number of cases has come down. The question is did an early mutation cause the virus deaths to spike or did a higher incidence of infection make it appear so? It’s sort of like the vaccines. Small sample sized trials “supposedly” looked ok. Now when used in higher numbers, problems look more common (I do think something is not right with them).

Be careful if you try to search for this. There’s a lot of “fact checkers” stating viruses do get worse and more deadly. But back in March 2020 CNN was saying viral mutations are normal and not a cause for concern. Here’s a good article with a level headed explanation: https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/more-than-you-ever-wanted-to-know-about-viral-mutation/ I like the way it is presented. In general extremes resort to something more moderate in viral cycles. This is true. I suspect we are seeing this with the Delta variant.

Here an example of how this crap is being spun: https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/jul/07/instagram-posts/data-showing-lower-death-rate-coronavirus-delta-va/

Politifact is ranking the statement that a study shows the delta variant is 19 times less deadly. Their rationale isn’t the math, it’s that the sample size is too small. Yet, if we are too believe that mutations are more deadly, wouldn’t we see more deaths early on as the new strain becomes more prevalent.

Here is the actual report referenced in the article: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1001354/Variants_of_Concern_VOC_Technical_Briefing_17.pdf

Actual Numbers: Alpha (Original): ~225k Cases w/ 1.9% death rate Delta: -92k cases w/ 0.1# death rate

Now the 92k number is actually not that small. In my simple mind, if the death rate was going to be higher, you’d see a trend emerge in a number that large. And it’s not like the Alpha case pool was 10 times larger either.

So… despite the fear mongering might we be seeing a less dangerous version of the virus taking hold? I suspect so. I also suspect that, as in Israel, you are going to see more problems with the vaccinated. I’m not sure why yet, except that Dr. Malone and Brett Weinstien’s theory that the mRNA vaccine spike protein is cytotoxic and causing problems might hold water.

I’m convinced Ivermectin is the key to making this go away. Yet it is being suppressed in favor of the vaccines, which do not look good in Israel at the moment (at least for the Delta). I also look at calls for more masks and lockdowns and suspect that they are rewriting history: convince the world that viruses DO get more deadly with time and force us to mask and hide in our homes again.

Think logically about this - if viruses got more lethal with time why is this the first pandemic in our lifetime? Shouldn’t it be the 100th? If we look at what we see and now what we are being told, deep down we all know something isn’t right.

1
ForThisiStand 1 point ago +1 / -0

Uh… “strip voting rights away from citizens who don't follow the rules?“ Yeah, I think if someone is too lazy (your words), too busy, too uninformed to figure out how vote LEGALLY their vote should not count. It’s that simple. You’re worried about protecting the votes of people who were voting outside the law, whether intentional or not. I’m worried about disenfranchising the 5MM GA voters, and the tens of millions of Americans, who legally cast their vote in favor of protecting those who couldn’t be bothered to follow the law. By the way, this law prevents funny business at the local level, not just the national elections. The focus is obviously on the Presidential race because we’re unhappy with the results. But there are probably several down ballot races impacted too. If you leave your county, you should not have a right to impact the outcome of that local election - I don’t care if you don’t have time to fill out a form or not.

From my perspective, 35,000-50,000 changes of address immediately preceding an election seems awfully high. So from that perspective something is off. Look at how they responded to this - they told this guy you can’t know this because you don’t have the SSN numbers. It wasn’t, “Here is the data showing you are wrong…” it was, “You can’t be right because you don’t have information you wouldn’t ever have anyway.” He pointed out there were voter ID numbers that could prove his point. Suddenly that changed their tune because they’ve realized they certified false results. To me, their response tells me this author is over the target. They got caught and they know it.

Do I think that there were multiple paths to cheating in this election? Yup. Sure do. Haven’t stopped thinking about seeing vote tallies switch in front of my eyes for months now. As we’ve seen, proving machine fraud is difficult and nobody seems to want to hear it. But this… it’s easy to see and understand. My primary concern is seeing these election results decertified as soon as possible. What these clowns are doing now is incredibly destructive. I want to undermine the cabal, because I believe both sides were in on it, and delegitimize everything they are trying to do. If this gets us there sooner and positions us to fix the election we will have an easier time uncovering these other methods of cheating and addressing them. It’s also the easiest way to get these bad actors out - prove they aren’t properly administering elections. I’m not so proud that winning this thing through singles and doubles seems like such a bad thing. A home run would be great but I’m not content to wait for that, or strike out again, in hopes that happens. We should take the small wind and build momentum from them.

2
ForThisiStand 2 points ago +2 / -0

Dude. It’s not a technicality. It’s a law. It’s designed to prevent people from voting twice. The article talks about what happens inside 30 days and even temporary moves. Think about how slow government operates. If you move before the election and your residency isn’t updated but you somehow become eligible in your new location and you vote twice, that’s illegal. What if one person submitted multiple change of address forms? What if someone steals your vote in your old or new locale? If that number of total address changes is abnormally high and the margin in the race is unusually low it indicates real systemic fraud. And if I remember correctly, GA was one of those states where many people were registered to addresses where buildings didn’t even exist. They uncovered lots of people registered to vote in those places. All this stuff ties together. Didn’t Democrats say they were going to “move” to Georgia for the supposed Senate runoff? Pretty sure Andrew Yang did, until he moved to NYC to suck as a mayoral candidate. This author is on to something. But perhaps more importantly, this “technicality” is the law. And if that law isn’t enforced, it’s likely others are not. Which goes back to my original statement: it’s designed to prevent fraud. If GA voters and legislators feel that is not the best way to achieve that, they should change the law. Laws should not be optional. Especially election law. If you try to place nice you open yourself up to be taken advantage of. And guess what? The minute discretion becomes the accepted norm is the minute we end up with a demented loser who cheated more than any candidate in the history of our country, as President.

3
ForThisiStand 3 points ago +3 / -0

Probably not, but if I’m not mistaken they’ve changed names and rebranded in the past… so there’s that too.

8
ForThisiStand 8 points ago +8 / -0

The part about this that I don’t like is that they are saying the machines cannot be used again because of the audit. So does that mean they are going to replace these things with Gen 2 machines that are engineered to cover their tracks better? These machines really only have one purpose, so it’s hard for me to even imagine how they can justify compromise based on the audit. If they can be compromised by an audit, aren’t they sort of admitting they can be compromised during an election too? I fear the replacements, because we have to assume they are learning from what’s gone on during and since the election. These legislators need to be considering laws and regulations surrounding what voting machines are or are not used. Better yet, no elected official should really be involved with elections or election integrity. I don’t care who you are, the temptation is too great. There needs to be an independent group that administers and protects our elections. Easy to say, hard to accomplish. But if we want universal confidence in our elections, those who stand to benefit should not be in charge.

view more: Next ›