Folks, we're all highly suspicious and skeptical of the "vaccines" for the Corona Virus. But I've seen very little discussion on what the specific endgame is if they were indeed developed for nefarious reasons as we all suspect. I'm hoping this will spur some specific discussion and critical thinking. The following is a mix of both fact and informed speculation. Apologies in advance for the length of this post, but I believe it's critically important that we start having thoughtful, intellectual conversations about the goal of this "vaccine".
What we know:
-We know that these "vaccines" were developed in an incredibly short period of time that does not allow for proper testing. Typically new drugs and vaccines take several years to hit the market. This fact alone should give all sane, critical-thinkers pause about getting this vaccine given the extremely low mortality rate for COVID 19.
-We know that the corona virus "vaccines" are classified as "experimental" by the FDA. If you are killed or permanently crippled by the injection, you have no legal recourse.
-We know that if you have no co-morbidities, you have nearly as good a chance to win the lottery than dying of COVID 19. The CDC admits that only 40k people have died from the virus with no co-morbidities. Of course, that number is likely far lower, but even with the likely inflation of that number, it's still tiny.
-We know that the younger you are, the less susceptible you are to the virus. Children are at nearly zero risk.
-However, numerous state agencies and politicians are urging young people to get vaccinated.
-The World Health Organization is now advising against giving the COVID "vaccine" to young children (for now). However, this has been largely ignored by the American propaganda machine.
-There are increasingly numerous reports of young children, especially boys having adverse cardiac reactions to the "vaccine", including death.
-We know that there's a substantial death rate from the "vaccines" based on the CDC's own VAERS data. The CDC has admitted to 6k deaths. However, there are several individuals who are pulling the VAERS data and analyzing it. They are seeing between 8-9k deaths along with exponentially larger numbers of people experiencing health issues post-vaccination.
-We have seen an unprecedented push by politicians, the agitprop media, Hollywood and professional sports to urge people to become vaccinated. Free money, beer and food for getting vaccinated. Rappers selling out and rapping about getting the jab. As diagnoses and deaths from Corona Virus drop, the push has only increased with the Resident in chief now preparing to send federal agents door to door to urge people to get vaccinated.
========================================
And there are almost certainly significant elements to the equation that I have not mentioned here.
I think it's safe to say that we all believe something nefarious is at work here. The question is one of motivation.
I have heard many people argue that this is simply a means of enriching Big Pharma. While this is a rational argument, I do not agree with it. None of these companies are short on money and I am skeptical that "the rich want to get richer" is an acceptable rationale for the world wide coordination we've seen. While I have little doubt that this is a secondary benefit, it is not the primary reason.
I have spent many hours researching and contemplating the motivations for the coordinated insanity & tyranny of the last 18 months. I have reached two possible conclusions as to the motivation:
- Increased governmental control over the populace. I can see two potential reasons/sub-theories here:
A. This is simply a very general, broad response to the Great Awakening in order to rapidly broaden the powers of the federal government over the people in a desperate bid to implement despotic rule quickly before it's too late.
B. There are control mechanisms that the Cabal needs to control in order to fend off the White Hats (for lack of a better term) that are attempting to bring them down. These mechanisms may be very subtle and not easily determined by us.
- Mass global depopulation. This is the one that scares me and it's where my mind continually goes as to the primary reason for this coordinated campaign. We have no shortage of evidence and on the record statements by the powerful that depopulation is one of their stated goals.
The question then becomes "How?". How can this "vaccine" allow for mass depopulation? While the vaccine can be initially deadly and I suspect death rates are FAR higher from it than the CDC is letting on, it's not high enough to significantly reduce the global population. I can only think of two primary mechanisms:
A. Infertility. This one is very fuzzy right now. There are doctors suggesting that infertility could be a side effect of these "vaccines", but we have very little real data right now showing that's the case. Sadly, we likely won't have substantial data to support/dismiss this theory for years as the "vaccinated" portion of the population gets older.
B. A backdoor mechanism such as ADE (Antibody Dependent Enhancement https://www.chop.edu/centers-programs/vaccine-education-center/vaccine-safety/antibody-dependent-enhancement-and-vaccines). This is the one that scares the hell out of me because we DO have data to support this theory from animal testing. We also had a report this past week that 4k "vaccinated" people have died from the virus which could be evidence of ADE occurring.
However, we must be careful because it's equally possible that this report is nothing more than a scare tactic being used to get people to continue to get "booster shots" of the "vaccine".
ADE is a real phenomenon that was observed during feline testing of mRNA "vaccines" for other COVID variants that affected the feline population in Asia. I am very, very concerned that this vaccine could be a back door to essentially give the cabal a kill switch for a large portion of the populace.
But again, these are only my thoughts. I believe that it is CRITICAL that people like us engage in deep discussion about the potential reasons for this vaccination push. We must not make assumptions as they prevent us from properly interpreting new data.
Apologies for such a long post. Thank you to those of you who made it this far.
Sylver this is unrelated, but I just found that my pre school is starting mask mandates for the children this coming fall. This is ludicrous and will not send him there if he's not allow without one, however, the school is otherwise ideal. What the best way to find the best/most recent scientific literature regarding masks/children not really being effected by coronavirus. Thanks for any help
This really deserves a more comprehensive post than I am about to give you, but I will give you some good information regardless. I'm not sure how it will help, but hopefully it can provide some knowledge.
The best path is perhaps to inform other parents and motivate a group insistence to not allow this to happen. People (parents in this case) have to be motivated to put their money where their mouth is though; that's the hardest part.
We give up our freedoms and even our health to fit into their world, instead of taking control ourselves. That is the Cabal's battlefield of choice, and we so often play right into it, just because its the easier path. That is how they win. They don't need to prove they are right, just make it so difficult for you to choose the path you want that you give up.
This is an excellent review paper and statement of hypothesis on the subject. It gives a ton of supporting documentation, and presents the case logically. It has been "debunked" of course and forced to be retracted, but of course the debunking said it wasn't "a study" (which is completely true, its a self described statement of hypothesis and a review of the literature) and that it wasn't "from Stanford" (also true, it never claimed to be, but is rather someone who has done work for Stanford). This is the art of debunking; debunk claims that are never made by the author themselves, but by some hapless media (or intentional disinformation media) that makes claims that are almost true, but not actually true by definition.
It talks about physical effects of a facemask, the ineffectiveness of them, the psychology, etc. It gets into a lot with a ton of supporting evidence (if you dig into it).
Here is the only study I have found that looks at actual viral transmission through various mask types using actual people. It is from 2015, before the pandemic, making it a much better resource than anything since 2019.
Here is their conclusion (bolded for emphasis):
The study, involving 1607 of people, the only known study of its type, concluded that wearing a cloth mask increases the risk of infection over wearing no mask at all.
This article corroborates this study. It is not a paper, though it does link to many as evidence. It is well written and evidence supported. It shows, among other things, including incriminating evidence by the PTB themselves, that masks harbor bacteria, and that this bacteria causes many of the illnesses associated with pandemics, including the number one killer in every pandemic; pneumonia, as elucidated in an article written by Dr. Anthony Mengele Fauci in 2008.
This paper is a meta data analysis from Mar. 2020 that only looked at surgical masks and N95 masks in controlled environments. They did not look at cloth masks, though surgical masks are effectively the same thing. Their Results section says "no statistical difference between surgical masks and no mask" but their numerical results themselves show significant increase in infection when wearing a mask v. no mask. Even the N95 studies showed at best a 40% reduction. The larger ones showed substantially less reduction than the smaller studies, suggesting they massaged the data to get a better result (though I did not do the math to say that for certain).
This evidence gives very strong support that masks do not help, rather that they increase the probability of getting sick. But there is another component that is very important, and that is reduced oxygen. I can't find good links for that in an initial search and I need to get back to work (though the hypothesis paper above does have some links for that, and the mask / bacteria article I think does as well). I would recommend looking for more information on that specific aspect (to compliment the above information). Reduced oxygen intake during growth is probably the largest concern from masking in children, and needs to be addressed in this public (dis)service of mask tyranny.