You can grab some popcorn and enjoy the show. You can admit that you got got and move on with your life. What can stop what is coming? The answer is nothing.
(media.greatawakening.win)
🤡 CLOWN WORLD 🤡
I respect your answer, but....
A quick search brings up a Wikipedia article discussing Trumps social media use.
Right now I’m comparing the window of (roughly) October 2017 (when Q started) to December 2019 (a few months before Qmap was shutdown)
In that time, Trump tweeted on average 16 times a day. Q posted on average, 6 times a day. That means Q had 6 opportunities per day to post directly before Trump, within the same exact minute, and they had to do that 20+ times in the 2 year span. Do we have any math fags in here who could calculate the probability of that happening?
I guess, pick your favorite celebrity and then you tweet 6 times a day, do that for the course of a year, and tell me how many times you’re able to post before AND within the same minute as them. If you can do it even three times, I’ll buy you a beer. If you can’t, I’ll still buy you the beer because I respect how you came into the lions den level headed.
It is a sound strategy to examine this question the way you’re suggesting. I have a busy weekend right now, but I’m going to come back to take a look at this later.
You are welcome to explain stuff any way you’d like. I try not to shame people for assuming I don’t know stuff unless they do it after I tell them I know stuff. Because sometimes I don’t know stuff and would rather have people err on the side of more complete information.
I am skeptical of deltas specifically because it looks like confirmation bias manifest. Taking two people who post a lot who you want to be connected will inevitably lead to connections being found.
I am curious, for instance, whether there are deltas between Trump Jr and Hillary Clinton, or Crissy Teigan and Rudy, or Patton Oswalt and Lin Wood, or any other delta correlation that you would rather consider a coincidence.
Because those same correlations likely exist in a million different combinations that you don’t see because you consider them stupid connections to make and don’t bother looking. And you consider the Q-Trump deltas important to your theory, so those connections must not be coincidences.
But I’m happy to take a closer look at this when I’m not relying exclusively on my phone for an internet connection.
Not my comment thread but I have to chime in.
Man, you clearly have a decent head on your shoulders and your mind is open. Truth be told, much of the delta and timestamp stuff that gets posted here is nonsense. There is often confirmation bias at play in those posts.
But that kind of ‘proof’ is not what convinced most of us that Q is more than a larp. I view that stuff as bored anons doing a little cheerleading. It’s peripheral to the pattern of bigger ‘coincidences’ that we find so compelling.
It's not about one or two coincidences. Math exists to determine the odds of a coincidence or three or ten, but not as many as we have here. It literally defies mathematics to believe that we still operate within the boundaries of simple (or even not simple) chance. We are in certainty territory.