GMO crops have laid the groundwork in this area and the intellectual property rights of patented and copyrighted genomic sequencing has been protected. Theoretically it is possible through reverse transcriptase to have foreign DNA taken up into the human genome.
Even after recovering from an infection there will always be a piece of that virus encoded within your DNA (depending on the type of virus). Approximately 8% of the human genome is made up of endogenous retroviruses (ERVs), which are viral gene sequences that have become a permanent part of the human lineage after they infected our ancient ancestors. And these endogenous retroviruses don’t just sit silently in the genome — their expression has been implicated in diseases like autoimmune disorders and breast cancer.
Even though this is an unpublished study, it does show that people are looking into this possible outcome and getting results that show that it is possible for foreign genetic sequencing to be taken up into the genome.
SARS-CoV-2 RNA reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome
As already mentioned, the legal groundwork for a future bioethical dilemma was laid when farmers, to their surprise, were found to be in violation of US patent and copyright law because their crops contained protected sequencing despite the fact that they did not intentionally utilize those protected genomic sequences in their crops. Foreign countries have fought hard to keep GMO seed crops out of their agriculture due to the pervasive nature of GMO spreading to native non-GMO crops.
We know that the possibility is real that patented and copywritten sequencing can be taken up into the genome. Whether that transfection is transient or permanent is yet to be determined. Many scientists that specialize in this area have been sounding the alarm on this point and I have no reason to doubt their credibility. This should be reason enough to halt this experiment until more information is gathered. This question must be answered.
The point is that none of the manufacturers of these vaxines have produced any studies to show that there was no uptake of either the DNA or the mRNA technology. So, since there is a lack of data to show that their products did not alter the human genome, it cannot be concluded that by omission that the possibility does not exist. The burden of proof was on them. But, if the hypothesis is true, the implications are frightening.
GMO crops have laid the groundwork in this area and the intellectual property rights of patented and copyrighted genomic sequencing has been protected. Theoretically it is possible through reverse transcriptase to have foreign DNA taken up into the human genome.
The Human Genome Is Full of Viruses
Discovery Identifies a Highly Efficient Human Reverse Transcriptase that can Write RNA Sequences into DNA
Even though this is an unpublished study, it does show that people are looking into this possible outcome and getting results that show that it is possible for foreign genetic sequencing to be taken up into the genome. SARS-CoV-2 RNA reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome
As already mentioned, the legal groundwork for a future bioethical dilemma was laid when farmers, to their surprise, were found to be in violation of US patent and copyright law because their crops contained protected sequencing despite the fact that they did not intentionally utilize those protected genomic sequences in their crops. Foreign countries have fought hard to keep GMO seed crops out of their agriculture due to the pervasive nature of GMO spreading to native non-GMO crops.
We know that the possibility is real that patented and copywritten sequencing can be taken up into the genome. Whether that transfection is transient or permanent is yet to be determined. Many scientists that specialize in this area have been sounding the alarm on this point and I have no reason to doubt their credibility. This should be reason enough to halt this experiment until more information is gathered. This question must be answered.
The point is that none of the manufacturers of these vaxines have produced any studies to show that there was no uptake of either the DNA or the mRNA technology. So, since there is a lack of data to show that their products did not alter the human genome, it cannot be concluded that by omission that the possibility does not exist. The burden of proof was on them. But, if the hypothesis is true, the implications are frightening.