Did you know that covid appeared to have HIV sequences stitched in?
Yes. I can't find the paper right now, but it is pretty clear that it is enough similarity that it highly unlikely to have been anything but a protein designed to make SARS more infectious, using HIV as a template. Those mutations do not happen by chance in two different viruses.
Wonder what's in the poison that they aren't telling us?
They don't need to put anything in they aren't telling us because what they put in that they ARE telling us is more than bad enough.
The spike protein itself is a toxin, and the vaccines induce our cells to make it. Its a particularly sinister evil.
I don't know why everyone is looking elsewhere for things that have no basis in biology to explain what biology says will happen. All the evidence points to the vaccines being exactly what they say they are.
What they say they are is a lipid nanoparticle that gets into our cells indiscriminately anywhere in the body, with a preference for certain organs. Included in that "anywhere" is the endothelium (vasculature). In fact this will be a highly likely cell to be infected, probably in the capillaries. This will cause these endothelial cells to make the spike protein, which will then cause damage in the neighboring cells in the vasculature (as well as the infected cell itself). It will also cause an immune response in the capillaries adding even more chance for damage. This disruption of capillary integrity causes exactly the types of disease modalities we see in the VAERS data.
There are other problems that the spike protein will cause, such as nerve damage, for very similar reasons to the capillary damage, but its all easily explained by the biology. There is no reason to be going outside of biology for fear porn (such as the article in the OP). There is plenty enough in the real stuff.
Did you know that covid appeared to have HIV sequences stitched in?
Don't know if I could find it now -- but last year I saved loads of information on the patents and sequencing.
Wonder what's in the poison that they aren't telling us?
Yes. I can't find the paper right now, but it is pretty clear that it is enough similarity that it highly unlikely to have been anything but a protein designed to make SARS more infectious, using HIV as a template. Those mutations do not happen by chance in two different viruses.
They don't need to put anything in they aren't telling us because what they put in that they ARE telling us is more than bad enough.
The spike protein itself is a toxin, and the vaccines induce our cells to make it. Its a particularly sinister evil.
I don't know why everyone is looking elsewhere for things that have no basis in biology to explain what biology says will happen. All the evidence points to the vaccines being exactly what they say they are.
What they say they are is a lipid nanoparticle that gets into our cells indiscriminately anywhere in the body, with a preference for certain organs. Included in that "anywhere" is the endothelium (vasculature). In fact this will be a highly likely cell to be infected, probably in the capillaries. This will cause these endothelial cells to make the spike protein, which will then cause damage in the neighboring cells in the vasculature (as well as the infected cell itself). It will also cause an immune response in the capillaries adding even more chance for damage. This disruption of capillary integrity causes exactly the types of disease modalities we see in the VAERS data.
There are other problems that the spike protein will cause, such as nerve damage, for very similar reasons to the capillary damage, but its all easily explained by the biology. There is no reason to be going outside of biology for fear porn (such as the article in the OP). There is plenty enough in the real stuff.